BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Anirudh Jain

Anirudh Jain contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Machine Learningastro-ph.IMComputer VisionEmerging Technologieshep-exphysics.data-an

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
3works
0followers
6topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2021arXiv

Confounding Tradeoffs for Neural Network Quantization

Many neural network quantization techniques have been developed to decrease the computational and memory footprint of deep learning. However, these methods are evaluated subject to confounding tradeoffs that may affect inference acceleration or resource complexity in exchange for higher accuracy. In this work, we articulate a variety of tradeoffs whose impact is often overlooked and empirically analyze their impact on uniform and mixed-precision post-training quantization, finding that these confounding tradeoffs may have a larger impact on quantized network accuracy than the actual quantization methods themselves. Because these tradeoffs constrain the attainable hardware acceleration for different use-cases, we encourage researchers to explicitly report these design choices through the structure of "quantization cards." We expect quantization cards to help researchers compare methods more effectively and engineers determine the applicability of quantization techniques for their hardware.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

Dynamic Precision Analog Computing for Neural Networks

Analog electronic and optical computing exhibit tremendous advantages over digital computing for accelerating deep learning when operations are executed at low precision. In this work, we derive a relationship between analog precision, which is limited by noise, and digital bit precision. We propose extending analog computing architectures to support varying levels of precision by repeating operations and averaging the result, decreasing the impact of noise. Such architectures enable programmable tradeoffs between precision and other desirable performance metrics such as energy efficiency or throughput. To utilize dynamic precision, we propose a method for learning the precision of each layer of a pre-trained model without retraining network weights. We evaluate this method on analog architectures subject to a variety of noise sources such as shot noise, thermal noise, and weight noise and find that employing dynamic precision reduces energy consumption by up to 89% for computer vision models such as Resnet50 and by 24% for natural language processing models such as BERT. In one example, we apply dynamic precision to a shot-noise limited homodyne optical neural network and simulate inference at an optical energy consumption of 2.7 aJ/MAC for Resnet50 and 1.6 aJ/MAC for BERT with <2% accuracy degradation.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

Variational Inference as an alternative to MCMC for parameter estimation and model selection

Most applications of Bayesian Inference for parameter estimation and model selection in astrophysics involve the use of Monte Carlo techniques such as Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) and nested sampling. However, these techniques are time consuming and their convergence to the posterior could be difficult to determine. In this work, we advocate Variational inference as an alternative to solve the above problems, and demonstrate its usefulness for parameter estimation and model selection in Astrophysics. Variational inference converts the inference problem into an optimization problem by approximating the posterior from a known family of distributions and using Kullback-Leibler divergence to characterize the difference. It takes advantage of fast optimization techniques, which make it ideal to deal with large datasets and makes it trivial to parallelize on a multicore platform. We also derive a new approximate evidence estimation based on variational posterior, and importance sampling technique called posterior weighted importance sampling for the calculation of evidence (PWISE), which is useful to perform Bayesian model selection. As a proof of principle, we apply variational inference to five different problems in astrophysics, where Monte Carlo techniques were previously used. These include assessment of significance of annual modulation in the COSINE-100 dark matter experiment, measuring exoplanet orbital parameters from radial velocity data, tests of periodicities in measurements of Newton&#39;s constant $G$, assessing the significance of a turnover in the spectral lag data of GRB 160625B and estimating the mass of a galaxy cluster using weak gravitational lensing. We find that variational inference is much faster than MCMC and nested sampling techniques for most of these problems while providing competitive results. All our analysis codes have been made publicly available.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access