BZPEERSource author record
Explore this author’s publications, collaborators and research topics. This catalog record has not been claimed by its author.
Catalog footprint
Published work
The inequality ∣X∣≤2χ(X) has been proved to be true for Lindelöf spaces (Arhangel'ski\uı, 1969), H-closed spaces (Dow-Porter, 1982) and ccc spaces (Hajnal-Juász 1967), by quite different arguments. We present a common extension of all these properties which allows us to give a unified proof of these three theorems.
We prove that if X is a regular space with no uncountable free sequences, then the tightness of its Gδ topology is at most continuum and if X is in addition Lindelöf then its Gδ topology contains no free sequences of length larger then the continuum. We also show that the higher cardinal generalization of our theorem does not hold, by constructing a regular space with no free sequences of length larger than ω1, but whose Gδ topology can have arbitrarily large tightness.
In a paper by Bella, Tokgös and Zdomskyy it is asked whether there exists a Tychonoff space X such that the remainder of Cp(X) in some compactification is Menger but not σ-compact. In this paper we prove that it is consistent that such space exists and in particular its existence follows from the existence of a Menger ultrafilter.
In this paper we discuss what kind of constrains combinatorial covering properties of Menger, Scheepers, and Hurewicz impose on remainders of topological groups. For instance, we show that such a remainder is Hurewicz if and only it is σ-compact. Also, the existence of a Scheepers non-σ-compact remainder of a topological group follows from CH and yields a P-point, and hence is independent of ZFC. We also make an attempt to prove a dichotomy for the Menger property of remainders of topological groups in the style of Arhangel'skii.
We give a general closing-off argument in Theorem 2.1 from which several corollaries follow, including (1) if X is a locally compact Hausdorff space then ∣X∣≤2wL(X)ψ(X), and (2) if X is a locally compact power homogeneous Hausdorff space then ∣X∣≤2wL(X)t(X). The first extends the well-known cardinality bound 2ψ(X) for a compactum X in a new direction. As ∣X∣≤2wL(X)χ(X) for a normal space X [3], this enlarges the class of known Tychonoff spaces for which this bound holds. In 2.10 we give a short, direct proof of (1) that does not use 2.1. Yet 2.1 is broad enough to establish results much more general than (1), such as if X is a regular space with a π-base $\scr{B}$ such that ∣B∣≤2wL(X)χ(X) for all $B\in\scr{B}$, then ∣X∣≤2wL(X)χ(X). Separately, it is shown that if X is a regular space with a π-base whose elements have compact closure, then ∣X∣≤2wL(X)ψ(X)t(X). This partially answers a question from [3] and gives a third, separate proof of (1). We also show that if X is a weakly Lindelöf, normal, sequential space with χ(X)≤2ℵ0, then ∣X∣≤2ℵ0. Result (2) above is a new generalization of the cardinality bound 2t(X) for a power homogeneous compactum X (Arhangel'skii, van Mill, and Ridderbos [2], De la Vega in the homogeneous case [9]). To this end we show that if U⊆clD⊆X, where X is power homogeneous and U is open, then ∣U∣≤∣D∣πχ(X). This is a strengthening of a result of Ridderbos [18].
For a topological space X and a point x∈X, consider the following game -- related to the property of X being countably tight at x. In each inning n∈ω, the first player chooses a set An that clusters at x, and then the second player picks a point an∈An; the second player is the winner if and only if x∈{an:n∈ω}. In this work, we study variations of this game in which the second player is allowed to choose finitely many points per inning rather than one, but in which the number of points they are allowed to choose in each inning has been fixed in advance. Surprisingly, if the number of points allowed per inning is the same throughout the play, then all of the games obtained in this fashion are distinct. We also show that a new game is obtained if the number of points the second player is allowed to pick increases at each inning.
The main purpose of the paper is the proof of a cardinal inequality for a space with points Gδ, obtained with the help of a long version of the Menger game. This result improves a similar one of Scheepers and Tall.
The two main results of this work are the following: if a space X is such that player II has a winning strategy in the game $\gone(Ω_x, Ω_x)$ for every x∈X, then X is productively countably tight. On the other hand, if a space is productively countably tight, then $\sone(Ω_x, Ω_x)$ holds for every x∈X. With these results, several other results follow, using some characterizations made by Uspenskii and Scheepers.
We try to characterize those Tychonoff spaces X such that βX∖X has the Menger property.
Inspired by work of Scheepers and Tall, we use properties defined by topological games to provide bounds for the cardinality of topological spaces. We obtain a partial answer to an old question of Bell, Ginsburg and Woods regarding the cardinality of weakly Lindelöf first-countable regular spaces and answer a question recently asked by Babinkostova, Pansera and Scheepers. In the second part of the paper we study a game-theoretic version of cellularity, a special case of which has been introduced by Aurichi. We obtain a game-theoretic proof of Shapirovskii's bound for the number of regular open sets in an (almost) regular space and give a partial answer to a natural question about the productivity of a game strengthening of the countable chain condition that was introduced by Aurichi. As a final application of our results we prove that the Hajnal-Juhász bound for the cardinality of a first-countable ccc Hausdorff space is true for almost regular (non-Hausdorff) spaces.
Inspired by a recent work of Dias and Tall, we show that a compact indestructible space is sequentially compact. We also prove that a Lindelof Hausdorff indestructible space has the finite derived set property and a compact Hausdorff indestructible space is pseudoradial.
A space X is called selectively separable(R-separable) if for every sequence of dense subspaces (Dn:n∈ω) one can pick finite (respectively, one-point) subsets Fn⊂Dn such that ⋃n∈ωFn is dense in X. These properties are much stronger than separability, but are equivalent to it in the presence of certain convergence properties. For example, we show that every Hausdorff separable radial space is R-separable and note that neither separable sequential nor separable Whyburn spaces have to be selectively separable. A space is called \emph{d-separable} if it has a dense σ-discrete subspace. We call a space X D-separable if for every sequence of dense subspaces (Dn:n∈ω) one can pick discrete subsets Fn⊂Dn such that ⋃n∈ωFn is dense in X. Although d-separable spaces are often also D-separable (this is the case, for example, with linearly ordered d-separable or stratifiable spaces), we offer three examples of countable non-D-separable spaces. It is known that d-separability is preserved by arbitrary products, and that for every X, the power Xd(X) is d-separable. We show that D-separability is not preserved even by finite products, and that for every infinite X, the power X2d(X) is not D-separable. However, for every X there is a Y such that X×Y is D-separable. Finally, we discuss selective and D-separability in the presence of maximality. For example, we show that (assuming d=c) there exists a maximal regular countable selectively separable space, and that (in ZFC) every maximal countable space is D-separable (while some of those are not selectively separable). However, no maximal space satisfies the natural game-theoretic strengthening of D-separability.
We investigate the Whyburn and weakly Whyburn property in the class of P-spaces, that is spaces where every countable intersection of open sets is open. We construct examples of non-weakly Whyburn P-spaces of size continuum, thus giving a negative answer under CH to a question of Pelant, Tkachenko, Tkachuk and Wilson. In addition, we show that the weak Kurepa Hypothesis (a set-theoretic assumption weaker than CH) implies the existence of a non-weakly Whyburn P-space of size ℵ2. Finally, we consider the behavior of the above-mentioned properties under products; we show in particular that the product of a Lindelöf weakly Whyburn P-space and a Lindelöf Whyburn P-space is weakly Whyburn, and we give a consistent example of a non-Whyburn product of two Lindelöf Whyburn P-spaces.
Research graph
Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.
BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.