Source author record

Camillo Costantini

Camillo Costantini appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

2works
2topics
3close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2011arXiv

On the One-Dimentional Pompeiu Problem

We investigate the Pompeiu property for subsets of the real line, under no assumption of connectedness. In particular we focus our study on finite unions of bounded (disjoint) intervals, and we emphasize the different results corresponding to the cases where the function in question is supposed to have constant integral on all isometric images, or just on all the translation-images of the domain. While no set of the previous kind enjoys the Pompeiu property in the latter sense, we provide a necessary and sufficient condition in order a union of two intervals to have the Pompeiu property in the former sense, and we produce some examples to give an insight of the complexity of the problem for three-interval sets.

preprint2010arXiv

P-spaces and the Whyburn property

We investigate the Whyburn and weakly Whyburn property in the class of $P$-spaces, that is spaces where every countable intersection of open sets is open. We construct examples of non-weakly Whyburn $P$-spaces of size continuum, thus giving a negative answer under CH to a question of Pelant, Tkachenko, Tkachuk and Wilson. In addition, we show that the weak Kurepa Hypothesis (a set-theoretic assumption weaker than CH) implies the existence of a non-weakly Whyburn $P$-space of size $\aleph_2$. Finally, we consider the behavior of the above-mentioned properties under products; we show in particular that the product of a Lindelöf weakly Whyburn P-space and a Lindelöf Whyburn $P$-space is weakly Whyburn, and we give a consistent example of a non-Whyburn product of two Lindelöf Whyburn $P$-spaces.