Researcher profile

Andrew Beveridge

Andrew Beveridge contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 21 - EmergingVerification L1Unclaimed author
8works
0followers
4topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

8 published item(s)

preprint2020arXiv

de Finetti Lattices and Magog Triangles

The order ideal $B_{n,2}$ of the Boolean lattice $B_n$ consists of all subsets of size at most $2$. Let $F_{n,2}$ denote the poset refinement of $B_{n,2}$ induced by the rules: $i < j$ implies $\{i \} \prec \{ j \}$ and $\{i,k \} \prec \{j,k\}$. We give an elementary bijection from the set $\mathcal{F}_{n,2}$ of linear extensions of $F_{n,2}$ to the set of shifted standard Young tableau of shape $(n, n-1, \ldots, 1)$, which are counted by the strict-sense ballot numbers. We find a more surprising result when considering the set $\mathcal{F}_{n,2}^{1}$ of minimal poset refinements in which each singleton is comparable with all of the doubletons. We show that $\mathcal{F}_{n,2}^{1}$ is in bijection with magog triangles, and therefore is equinumerous with alternating sign matrices. We adopt our proof techniques to show that row reversal of an alternating sign matrix corresponds to a natural involution on gog triangles.

preprint2020arXiv

Line-of-Sight Pursuit in Monotone and Scallop Polygons

We study a turn-based game in a simply connected polygonal environment $Q$ between a pursuer $P$ and an adversarial evader $E$. Both players can move in a straight line to any point within unit distance during their turn. The pursuer $P$ wins by capturing the evader, meaning that their distance satisfies $d(P, E) \leq 1$, while the evader wins by eluding capture forever. Both players have a map of the environment, but they have different sensing capabilities. The evader $E$ always knows the location of $P$. Meanwhile, $P$ only has line-of-sight visibility: $P$ observes the evader&#39;s position only when the line segment connecting them lies entirely within the polygon. Therefore $P$ must search for $E$ when the evader is hidden from view. We provide a winning strategy for $P$ in two families of polygons: monotone polygons and scallop polygons. In both families, a straight line $L$ can be moved continuously over $Q$ so that (1) $L \cap Q$ is a line segment and (2) every point on the boundary $\partial Q$ is swept exactly once. These are both subfamilies of strictly sweepable polygons. The sweeping motion for a monotone polygon is a single translation, and the sweeping motion for a scallop polygon is a single rotation. Our algorithms use rook&#39;s strategy during its pursuit phase, rather than the well-known lion&#39;s strategy. The rook&#39;s strategy is crucial for obtaining a capture time that is linear in the area of $Q$. For both monotone and scallop polygons, our algorithm has a capture time of $O(n(Q) + \mbox{area}(Q))$, where $n(Q)$ is the number of polygon vertices.

preprint2020arXiv

The Voter Basis and the Admissibility of Tree Characters

When making simultaneous decisions, our preference for the outcomes on one subset can depend on the outcomes on a disjoint subset. In referendum elections, this gives rise to the separability problem, where a voter must predict the outcome of one proposal when casting their vote on another. A set $S \subset [n]$ is separable for preference order $\succeq$ when our ranking of outcomes on $S$ is independent of outcomes on its complement $[n]-S$. The admissibility problem asks which characters $\mathcal{C} \subset \mathcal{P}([n])$ can arise as the collection of separable subsets for some preference order. We introduce a linear algebraic technique to construct preference orders with desired characters. Each vector in our $2^n$-dimensional voter basis induces a simple preference ordering with nice separability properties. Given any collection $\mathcal{C} \subset \mathcal{P}([n])$ whose subset lattice has a tree structure, we use the voter basis to construct a preference order with character $\mathcal{C}$.

preprint2013arXiv

Maker-Breaker games on random geometric graphs

In a Maker-Breaker game on a graph $G$, Breaker and Maker alternately claim edges of $G$. Maker wins if, after all edges have been claimed, the graph induced by his edges has some desired property. We consider four Maker-Breaker games played on random geometric graphs. For each of our four games we show that if we add edges between $n$ points chosen uniformly at random in the unit square by order of increasing edge-length then, with probability tending to one as $n\to\infty$, the graph becomes Maker-win the very moment it satisfies a simple necessary condition. In particular, with high probability, Maker wins the connectivity game as soon as the minimum degree is at least two; Maker wins the Hamilton cycle game as soon as the minimum degree is at least four; Maker wins the perfect matching game as soon as the minimum degree is at least two and every edge has at least three neighbouring vertices; and Maker wins the $H$-game as soon as there is a subgraph from a finite list of &#34;minimal graphs&#34;. These results also allow us to give precise expressions for the limiting probability that $G(n,r)$ is Maker-win in each case, where $G(n,r)$ is the graph on $n$ points chosen uniformly at random on the unit square with an edge between two points if and only if their distance is at most $r$.

preprint2013arXiv

On the minimum order of k-cop-win graphs

We consider the minimum order graphs with a given cop number. We prove that the minimum order of a connected graph with cop number 3 is 10, and show that the Petersen graph is the unique isomorphism type of graph with this property. We provide the results of a computational search on the cop number of all graphs up to and including order 10. A relationship is presented between the minimum order of graph with cop number $k$ and Meyniel&#39;s conjecture on the asymptotic maximum value of the cop number of a connected graph.

preprint2012arXiv

The Petersen graph is the smallest 3-cop-win graph

In the game of \emph{cops and robbers} on a graph $G = (V,E)$, $k$ cops try to catch a robber. On the cop turn, each cop may move to a neighboring vertex or remain in place. On the robber&#39;s turn, he moves similarly. The cops win if there is some time at which a cop is at the same vertex as the robber. Otherwise, the robber wins. The minimum number of cops required to catch the robber is called the \emph{cop number} of $G$, and is denoted $c(G)$. Let $m_k$ be the minimum order of a connected graph satisfying $c(G) \geq k$. Recently, Baird and Bonato determined via computer search that $m_3=10$ and that this value is attained uniquely by the Petersen graph. Herein, we give a self-contained mathematical proof of this result. Along the way, we give some characterizations of graphs with $c(G) >2$ and very high maximum degree.

preprint2011arXiv

Cops and Robbers on Geometric Graphs

Cops and robbers is a turn-based pursuit game played on a graph $G$. One robber is pursued by a set of cops. In each round, these agents move between vertices along the edges of the graph. The cop number $c(G)$ denotes the minimum number of cops required to catch the robber in finite time. We study the cop number of geometric graphs. For points $x_1, ..., x_n \in \R^2$, and $r \in \R^+$, the vertex set of the geometric graph $G(x_1, ..., x_n; r)$ is the graph on these $n$ points, with $x_i, x_j$ adjacent when $ \norm{x_i -x_j} \leq r$. We prove that $c(G) \leq 9$ for any connected geometric graph $G$ in $R^2$ and we give an example of a connected geometric graph with $c(G) = 3$. We improve on our upper bound for random geometric graphs that are sufficiently dense. Let $G(n,r)$ denote the probability space of geometric graphs with $n$ vertices chosen uniformly and independently from $[0,1]^2$. For $G \in G(n,r)$, we show that with high probability (whp), if $r \geq K_1 (\log n/n)^{1/4}$, then $c(G) \leq 2$, and if $r \geq K_2(\log n/n)^{1/5}$, then $c(G) = 1$ where $K_1, K_2 > 0$ are absolute constants. Finally, we provide a lower bound near the connectivity regime of $G(n,r)$: if $r \leq K_3 \log n / \sqrt{n} $ then $c(G) > 1$ whp, where $K_3 > 0$ is an absolute constant.

preprint2011arXiv

On the Mixing Time of Geographical Threshold Graphs

We study the mixing time of random graphs in the $d$-dimensional toric unit cube $[0,1]^d$ generated by the geographical threshold graph (GTG) model, a generalization of random geometric graphs (RGG). In a GTG, nodes are distributed in a Euclidean space, and edges are assigned according to a threshold function involving the distance between nodes as well as randomly chosen node weights, drawn from some distribution. The connectivity threshold for GTGs is comparable to that of RGGs, essentially corresponding to a connectivity radius of $r=(\log n/n)^{1/d}$. However, the degree distributions at this threshold are quite different: in an RGG the degrees are essentially uniform, while RGGs have heterogeneous degrees that depend upon the weight distribution. Herein, we study the mixing times of random walks on $d$-dimensional GTGs near the connectivity threshold for $d \geq 2$. If the weight distribution function decays with $\mathbb{P}[W \geq x] = O(1/x^{d+ν})$ for an arbitrarily small constant $ν>0$ then the mixing time of GTG is $\mixbound$. This matches the known mixing bounds for the $d$-dimensional RGG.