Paper detail

The Voter Basis and the Admissibility of Tree Characters

When making simultaneous decisions, our preference for the outcomes on one subset can depend on the outcomes on a disjoint subset. In referendum elections, this gives rise to the separability problem, where a voter must predict the outcome of one proposal when casting their vote on another. A set $S \subset [n]$ is separable for preference order $\succeq$ when our ranking of outcomes on $S$ is independent of outcomes on its complement $[n]-S$. The admissibility problem asks which characters $\mathcal{C} \subset \mathcal{P}([n])$ can arise as the collection of separable subsets for some preference order. We introduce a linear algebraic technique to construct preference orders with desired characters. Each vector in our $2^n$-dimensional voter basis induces a simple preference ordering with nice separability properties. Given any collection $\mathcal{C} \subset \mathcal{P}([n])$ whose subset lattice has a tree structure, we use the voter basis to construct a preference order with character $\mathcal{C}$.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.