BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Andrei A. Bulatov

Andrei A. Bulatov contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Computational ComplexityLogic in Computer ScienceDiscrete Mathematics

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
3works
0followers
3topics
1close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2020arXiv

A dichotomy theorem for nonuniform CSPs simplified

In a non-uniform Constraint Satisfaction problem CSP(G), where G is a set of relations on a finite set A, the goal is to find an assignment of values to variables subject to constraints imposed on specified sets of variables using the relations from G. The Dichotomy Conjecture for the non-uniform CSP states that for every constraint language G the problem CSP(G) is either solvable in polynomial time or is NP-complete. It was proposed by Feder and Vardi in their seminal 1993 paper. In this paper we confirm the Dichotomy Conjecture.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Approximate counting CSP seen from the other side

In this paper we study the complexity of counting Constraint Satisfaction Problems (CSPs) of the form #CSP($\mathcal{C}$,-), in which the goal is, given a relational structure $\mathbf{A}$ from a class $\mathcal{C}$ of structures and an arbitrary structure $\mathbf{B}$, to find the number of homomorphisms from $\mathbf{A}$ to $\mathbf{B}$. Flum and Grohe showed that #CSP($\mathcal{C}$,-) is solvable in polynomial time if $\mathcal{C}$ has bounded treewidth [FOCS'02]. Building on the work of Grohe [JACM'07] on decision CSPs, Dalmau and Jonsson then showed that, if $\mathcal{C}$ is a recursively enumerable class of relational structures of bounded arity, then assuming FPT $\neq$ #W[1], there are no other cases of #CSP($\mathcal{C}$,-) solvable exactly in polynomial time (or even fixed-parameter time) [TCS'04]. We show that, assuming FPT $\neq$ W[1] (under randomised parametrised reductions) and for $\mathcal{C}$ satisfying certain general conditions, #CSP($\mathcal{C}$,-) is not solvable even approximately for $\mathcal{C}$ of unbounded treewidth; that is, there is no fixed parameter tractable (and thus also not fully polynomial) randomised approximation scheme for #CSP($\mathcal{C}$,-). In particular, our condition generalises the case when $\mathcal{C}$ is closed under taking minors.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Graphs of relational structures: restricted types

The algebraic approach to the Constraint Satisfaction Problem (CSP) uses high order symmetries of relational structures -- polymorphisms -- to study the complexity of the CSP. In this paper we further develop one of the methods the algebraic approach can be implemented, and apply it to some kinds of the CSP. This method was introduced in our LICS 2004 paper and involves the study of the local structure of finite algebras and relational structures. It associates with an algebra A or a relational structure S a graph, whose vertices are the elements of A (or S), the edges represent subsets of A such that the restriction of some term operation of A is `good' on the subset, that is, act as an operation of one of the 3 types: semilattice, majority, or affine. In this paper we use this theory and consider algebras with edges from a restricted set of types. We prove type restrictions are preserved under the standard algebraic constructions. Then we show that if the types edges in a relational structure are restricted, then the corresponding CSP can be solved in polynomial time by specific algorithms. In particular, we give a new, somewhat more intuitive proof of the Bounded Width Theorem: the CSP over algebra A has bounded width if and only if A does not contain affine edges. Actually, this result shows that bounded width implies width (2,3). Finally, we prove that algebras without semilattice edges have few subalgebras of powers, that is, the CSP over such algebras is also polynomial time. The methods and results obtained in this paper are important ingredients of the 2017 proof of the Dichotomy Conjecture by the author. The Dichotomy Conjecture was also proved independently by Zhuk.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access