Paper detail

Properties of quasi-alphabetic tree bimorphisms

We study the class of quasi-alphabetic relations, i.e., tree transformations defined by tree bimorphisms with two quasi-alphabetic tree homomorphisms and a regular tree language. We present a canonical representation of these relations; as an immediate consequence, we get the closure under union. Also, we show that they are not closed under intersection and complement, and do not preserve most common operations on trees (branches, subtrees, v-product, v-quotient, f-top-catenation). Moreover, we prove that the translations defined by quasi-alphabetic tree bimorphism are exactly products of context-free string languages. We conclude by presenting the connections between quasi-alphabetic relations, alphabetic relations and classes of tree transformations defined by several types of top-down tree transducers. Furthermore, we get that quasi-alphabetic relations preserve the recognizable and algebraic tree languages.

preprint2009arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.