BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Andreas Gocht

Andreas Gocht contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster ComputingPerformanceMachine LearningMathematical Software

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
3works
0followers
4topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2020arXiv

Energy Efficiency Features of the Intel Skylake-SP Processor and Their Impact on Performance

The overwhelming majority of High Performance Computing (HPC) systems and server infrastructure uses Intel x86 processors. This makes an architectural analysis of these processors relevant for a wide audience of administrators and performance engineers. In this paper, we describe the effects of hardware controlled energy efficiency features for the Intel Skylake-SP processor. Due to the prolonged micro-architecture cycles, which extend the previous Tick-Tock scheme by Intel, our findings will also be relevant for succeeding architectures. The findings of this paper include the following: C-state latencies increased significantly over the Haswell-EP processor generation. The mechanism that controls the uncore frequency has a latency of approximately 10 ms and it is not possible to truly fix the uncore frequency to a specific level. The out-of-order throttling for workloads using 512 bit wide vectors also occurs at low processor frequencies. Data has a significant impact on processor power consumption which causes a large error in energy models relying only on instructions.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Q-Learning Inspired Self-Tuning for Energy Efficiency in HPC

System self-tuning is a crucial task to lower the energy consumption of computers. Traditional approaches decrease the processor frequency in idle or synchronisation periods. However, in High-Performance Computing (HPC) this is not sufficient: if the executed code is load balanced, there are neither idle nor synchronisation phases that can be exploited. Therefore, alternative self-tuning approaches are needed, which allow exploiting different compute characteristics of HPC programs. The novel notion of application regions based on function call stacks, introduced in the Horizon 2020 Project READEX, allows us to define such a self-tuning approach. In this paper, we combine these regions with the Q-Learning typical state-action maps, which save information about available states, possible actions to take, and the expected rewards. By exploiting the existing processor power interface, we are able to provide direct feedback to the learning process. This approach allows us to save up to 15% energy, while only adding a minor runtime overhead.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Using performance analysis tools for parallel-in-time integrators -- Does my time-parallel code do what I think it does?

While many ideas and proofs of concept for parallel-in-time integration methods exists, the number of large-scale, accessible time-parallel codes is rather small. This is often due to the apparent or subtle complexity of the algorithms and the many pitfalls awaiting developers of parallel numerical software. One example of such a time-parallel code is pySDC, which implements, among others, the parallel full approximation scheme in space and time (PFASST). Inspired by nonlinear multigrid ideas, PFASST allows to integrate multiple time-steps simultaneously using a space-time hierarchy of spectral deferred corrections. In this paper we demonstrate the application of performance analysis tools to the PFASST implementation pySDC. Tracing the path we took for this work, we highlight the obstacles encountered, describe remedies and explain the sometimes surprising findings made possible by the tools. Although focusing only on a single implementation of a particular parallel-in-time integrator, we hope that our results and in particular the way we obtained them are a blueprint for other time-parallel codes.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access