BZPEERPapers, people, evidence and research paths
Menu

Discover

SearchFind papers, people, topics, institutions and opportunities from one place.GraphSee how papers, authors, topics and evidence connect.

Research tools

HomeContinue from the papers, people and topics that matter now.CollectionsTurn saved papers into reading lists, evidence maps and shareable context.ResearchReconstruct the path that led you from search to paper to question.CollaborationMove from a paper, topic or expert request into a focused thread.PublishCreate full-text research articles with metadata, formulas and versions.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists whose work and reviews explain why they can help.CommunitiesJoin research groups organized around papers, topics and shared evidence.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations connected to real research context.

Account

Log inReturn to your saved papers, graph views and active threads.Create accountStart saving papers, building a research trail and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Source author record

Andreas Buja

Andreas Buja appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record
Methodologymath.STStatistics TheoryComputationhep-exMachine Learning

Catalog footprint

What is connected

7works
6topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim
Open graphBrowse works

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

7 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Hole or grain? A Section Pursuit Index for Finding Hidden Structure in Multiple Dimensions

Multivariate data is often visualized using linear projections, produced by techniques such as principal component analysis, linear discriminant analysis, and projection pursuit. A problem with projections is that they obscure low and high density regions near the center of the distribution. Sections, or slices, can help to reveal them. This paper develops a section pursuit method, building on the extensive work in projection pursuit, to search for interesting slices of the data. Linear projections are used to define sections of the parameter space, and to calculate interestingness by comparing the distribution of observations, inside and outside a section. By optimizing this index, it is possible to reveal features such as holes (low density) or grains (high density). The optimization is incorporated into a guided tour so that the search for structure can be dynamic. The approach can be useful for problems when data distributions depart from uniform or normal, as in visually exploring nonlinear manifolds, and functions in multivariate space. Two applications of section pursuit are shown: exploring decision boundaries from classification models, and exploring subspaces induced by complex inequality conditions from multiple parameter model. The new methods are available in R, in the tourr package.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Kernel Additive Principal Components

Additive principal components (APCs for short) are a nonlinear generalization of linear principal components. We focus on smallest APCs to describe additive nonlinear constraints that are approximately satisfied by the data. Thus APCs fit data with implicit equations that treat the variables symmetrically, as opposed to regression analyses which fit data with explicit equations that treat the data asymmetrically by singling out a response variable. We propose a regularized data-analytic procedure for APC estimation using kernel methods. In contrast to existing approaches to APCs that are based on regularization through subspace restriction, kernel methods achieve regularization through shrinkage and therefore grant distinctive flexibility in APC estimation by allowing the use of infinite-dimensional functions spaces for searching APC transformation while retaining computational feasibility. To connect population APCs and kernelized finite-sample APCs, we study kernelized population APCs and their associated eigenproblems, which eventually lead to the establishment of consistency of the estimated APCs. Lastly, we discuss an iterative algorithm for computing kernelized finite-sample APCs.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

Improved Precision in Estimating Average Treatment Effects

The Average Treatment Effect (ATE) is a global measure of the effectiveness of an experimental treatment intervention. Classical methods of its estimation either ignore relevant covariates or do not fully exploit them. Moreover, past work has considered covariates as fixed. We present a method for improving the precision of the ATE estimate: the treatment and control responses are estimated via a regression, and information is pooled between the groups to produce an asymptotically unbiased estimate; we subsequently justify the random X paradigm underlying the result. Standard errors are derived, and the estimator's performance is compared to the traditional estimator. Conditions under which the regression-based estimator is preferable are detailed, and a demonstration on real data is presented.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

Penalized Split Criteria for Interpretable Trees

This paper describes techniques for growing classification and regression trees designed to induce visually interpretable trees. This is achieved by penalizing splits that extend the subset of features used in a particular branch of the tree. After a brief motivation, we summarize existing methods and introduce new ones, providing illustrative examples throughout. Using a number of real classification and regression datasets, we find that these procedures can offer more interpretable fits than the CART methodology with very modest increases in out-of-sample loss.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

Valid post-selection inference

It is common practice in statistical data analysis to perform data-driven variable selection and derive statistical inference from the resulting model. Such inference enjoys none of the guarantees that classical statistical theory provides for tests and confidence intervals when the model has been chosen a priori. We propose to produce valid ``post-selection inference'' by reducing the problem to one of simultaneous inference and hence suitably widening conventional confidence and retention intervals. Simultaneity is required for all linear functions that arise as coefficient estimates in all submodels. By purchasing ``simultaneity insurance'' for all possible submodels, the resulting post-selection inference is rendered universally valid under all possible model selection procedures. This inference is therefore generally conservative for particular selection procedures, but it is always less conservative than full Scheffe protection. Importantly it does not depend on the truth of the selected submodel, and hence it produces valid inference even in wrong models. We describe the structure of the simultaneous inference problem and give some asymptotic results.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2011arXiv

A Sparse SVD Method for High-dimensional Data

We present a new computational approach to approximating a large, noisy data table by a low-rank matrix with sparse singular vectors. The approximation is obtained from thresholded subspace iterations that produce the singular vectors simultaneously, rather than successively as in competing proposals. We introduce novel ways to estimate thresholding parameters which obviate the need for computationally expensive cross-validation. We also introduce a way to sparsely initialize the algorithm for computational savings that allow our algorithm to outperform the vanilla SVD on the full data table when the signal is sparse. A comparison with two existing sparse SVD methods suggests that our algorithm is computationally always faster and statistically always at least comparable to the better of the two competing algorithms.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access