Researcher profile

Andrea R. Beccari

Andrea R. Beccari contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 11 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
1works
0followers
1topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

1 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

GPU-optimized Approaches to Molecular Docking-based Virtual Screening in Drug Discovery: A Comparative Analysis

COVID-19 has shown the importance of having a fast response against pandemics. Finding a novel drug is a very long and complex procedure, and it is possible to accelerate the preliminary phases by using computer simulations. In particular, virtual screening is an in-silico phase that is needed to filter a large set of possible drug candidates to a manageable number. This paper presents the implementations and a comparative analysis of two GPU-optimized implementations of a virtual screening algorithm targeting novel GPU architectures. The first adopts a traditional approach that spreads the computation required to evaluate a single molecule across the entire GPU. The second uses a batched approach that exploits the parallel architecture of the GPU to evaluate more molecules in parallel, without considering the latency to process a single molecule. The paper describes the advantages and disadvantages of the proposed solutions, highlighting implementation details that impact the performance. Experimental results highlight the different performance of the two methods on several target molecule databases while running on NVIDIA A100 GPUs. The two implementations have a strong dependency with respect to the data to be processed. For both cases, the performance is improving while reducing the dimension of the target molecules (number of atoms and rotatable bonds). The two methods demonstrated a different behavior with respect to the size of the molecule database to be screened. While the latency one reaches sooner (with fewer molecules) the performance plateau in terms of throughput, the batched one requires a larger set of molecules. However, the performances after the initial transient period are much higher (up to 5x speed-up). Finally, to check the efficiency of both implementations we deeply analyzed their workload characteristics using the instruction roof-line methodology.