BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Tamás Keleti

Tamás Keleti contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
math.CAmath.LOmath.MG

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 21 - EmergingVerification L1Unclaimed author
8works
0followers
3topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

8 published item(s)

preprint2014arXiv

Decomposing the real line into Borel sets closed under addition

We consider decompositions of the real line into pairwise disjoint Borel pieces so that each piece is closed under addition. How many pieces can there be? We prove among others that the number of pieces is either at most 3 or uncountable, and we show that it is undecidable in $ZFC$ and even in the theory $ZFC + \mathfrak{c} = ω_2$ if the number of pieces can be uncountable but less than the continuum. We also investigate various versions: what happens if we drop the Borelness requirement, if we replace addition by multiplication, if the pieces are subgroups, if we partition $(0,\infty)$, and so on.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2012arXiv

Hausdorff dimension and non-degenerate families of projections

We study parametrized families of orthogonal projections for which the dimension of the parameter space is strictly less than that of the Grassmann manifold. We answer the natural question of how much the Hausdorff dimension may decrease by verifying the best possible lower bound for the dimension of almost all projections of a finite measure. We also show that a similar result is valid for smooth families of maps from $n$-dimensional Euclidean space to $m$-dimensional one.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2012arXiv

Hausdorff dimension of metric spaces and Lipschitz maps onto cubes

We prove that a compact metric space (or more generally an analytic subset of a complete separable metric space) of Hausdorff dimension bigger than $k$ can be always mapped onto a $k$-dimensional cube by a Lipschitz map. We also show that this does not hold for arbitrary separable metric spaces. As an application we essentially answer a question of Urbański by showing that the transfinite Hausdorff dimension (introduced by him) of an analytic subset $A$ of a complete separable metric space is the integer part of $\dim_H A$ if $\dim_H A$ is finite but not an integer, $\dim_H A$ or $\dim_H A-1$ if $\dim_H A$ is an integer and at least $ω_0$ if $\dim_H A=\infty$.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2012arXiv

How large dimension guarantees a given angle?

We study the following two problems: (1) Given $n\ge 2$ and $\al$, how large Hausdorff dimension can a compact set $A\su\Rn$ have if $A$ does not contain three points that form an angle $\al$? (2) Given $\al$ and $\de$, how large Hausdorff dimension can a %compact subset $A$ of a Euclidean space have if $A$ does not contain three points that form an angle in the $\de$-neighborhood of $\al$? An interesting phenomenon is that different angles show different behaviour in the above problems. Apart from the clearly special extreme angles 0 and $180^\circ$, the angles $60^\circ,90^\circ$ and $120^\circ$ also play special role in problem (2): the maximal dimension is smaller for these special angles than for the other angles. In problem (1) the angle $90^\circ$ seems to behave differently from other angles.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2012arXiv

Reconstructing geometric objects from the measures of their intersections with test sets

Let us say that an element of a given family $\A$ of subsets of $\R^d$ can be reconstructed using $n$ test sets if there exist $T_1,...,T_n \subset \R^d$ such that whenever $A,B\in \A$ and the Lebesgue measures of $A \cap T_i$ and $B \cap T_i$ agree for each $i=1,...,n$ then $A=B$. Our goal will be to find the least such $n$. We prove that if $\A$ consists of the translates of a fixed reasonably nice subset of $\R^d$ then this minimum is $n=d$. In order to obtain this result we reconstruct a translate of a fixed function using $d$ test sets as well, and also prove that under rather mild conditions the measure function $f_{K,θ} (r) = \la^{d-1} (K \cap \{x \in \RR^d : <x,θ> = r\})$ of the sections of $K$ is absolutely continuous for almost every direction $θ$. These proofs are based on techniques of harmonic analysis. We also show that if $\A$ consists of the magnified copies $rE+t$ $(r\ge 1, t\in\R^d)$ of a fixed reasonably nice set $E\subset \R^d$, where $d\ge 2$, then $d+1$ test sets reconstruct an element of $\A$. This fails in $\R$: we prove that an interval, and even an interval of length at least 1 cannot be reconstructed using 2 test sets. Finally, using randomly constructed test sets, we prove that an element of a reasonably nice $k$-dimensional family of geometric objects can be reconstructed using $2k+1$ test sets. A example from algebraic topology shows that $2k+1$ is sharp in general.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2011arXiv

Borel sets which are null or non-$σ$-finite for every translation invariant measure

We show that the set of Liouville numbers is either null or non-$σ$-finite with respect to every translation invariant Borel measure on $\RR$, in particular, with respect to every Hausdorff measure $\iH^g$ with gauge function $g$. This answers a question of D. Mauldin. We also show that some other simply defined Borel sets like non-normal or some Besicovitch-Eggleston numbers, as well as all Borel subgroups of $\RR$ that are not $F_σ$ possess the above property. We prove that, apart from some trivial cases, the Borel class, Hausdorff or packing dimension of a Borel set with no such measure on it can be arbitrary.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2011arXiv

Is Lebesgue measure the only $σ$-finite invariant Borel measure?

R.D.Mauldin asked if every translation invariant $σ$-finite Borel measure on $\RR^d$ is a constant multiple of Lebesgue measure. The aim of this paper is to show that the answer is &#34;yes and no&#34;, since surprisingly the answer depends on what we mean by Borel measure and by constant. We present Mauldin&#39;s proof of what he called a folklore result, stating that if the measure is only defined for Borel sets then the answer is affirmative. Then we show that if the measure is defined on a $σ$-algebra \emph{containing} the Borel sets then the answer is negative. However, if we allow the multiplicative constant to be infinity, then the answer is affirmative in this case as well. Moreover, our construction also shows that an isometry invariant $σ$-finite Borel measure (in the wider sense) on $\RR^d$ can be non-$σ$-finite when we restrict it to the Borel sets.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access