BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Anand Sivasubramaniam

Anand Sivasubramaniam contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster ComputingMachine LearningPerformanceSoftware Engineering

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
3works
0followers
4topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

GraphGuess: Approximate Graph Processing System with Adaptive Correction

Graph-based data structures have drawn great attention in recent years. The large and rapidly growing trend on developing graph processing systems focuses mostly on improving the performance by preprocessing the input graph and modifying its layout. These systems usually take several hours to days to complete processing a single graph on high-end machines, let alone the overhead of pre-processing which most of the time can be dominant. Yet for most graph applications the exact answer is not always crucial, and providing a rough estimate of the final result is adequate. Approximate computing is introduced to trade off accuracy of results for computation or energy savings that could not be achieved by conventional techniques alone. In this work, we design, implement and evaluate GraphGuess, inspired from the domain of approximate graph theory and extend it to a general, practical graph processing system. GraphGuess is essentially an approximate graph processing technique with adaptive correction, which can be implemented on top of any graph processing system. We build a vertex-centric processing system based on GraphGuess, where it allows the user to trade off accuracy for better performance. Our experimental studies show that using GraphGuess can significantly reduce the processing time for large scale graphs while maintaining high accuracy.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Learn Locally, Correct Globally: A Distributed Algorithm for Training Graph Neural Networks

Despite the recent success of Graph Neural Networks (GNNs), training GNNs on large graphs remains challenging. The limited resource capacities of the existing servers, the dependency between nodes in a graph, and the privacy concern due to the centralized storage and model learning have spurred the need to design an effective distributed algorithm for GNN training. However, existing distributed GNN training methods impose either excessive communication costs or large memory overheads that hinders their scalability. To overcome these issues, we propose a communication-efficient distributed GNN training technique named $\text{Learn Locally, Correct Globally}$ (LLCG). To reduce the communication and memory overhead, each local machine in LLCG first trains a GNN on its local data by ignoring the dependency between nodes among different machines, then sends the locally trained model to the server for periodic model averaging. However, ignoring node dependency could result in significant performance degradation. To solve the performance degradation, we propose to apply $\text{Global Server Corrections}$ on the server to refine the locally learned models. We rigorously analyze the convergence of distributed methods with periodic model averaging for training GNNs and show that naively applying periodic model averaging but ignoring the dependency between nodes will suffer from an irreducible residual error. However, this residual error can be eliminated by utilizing the proposed global corrections to entail fast convergence rate. Extensive experiments on real-world datasets show that LLCG can significantly improve the efficiency without hurting the performance.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

IoTRepair: Systematically Addressing Device Faults in Commodity IoT (Extended Paper)

IoT devices are decentralized and deployed in un-stable environments, which causes them to be prone to various kinds of faults, such as device failure and network disruption. Yet, current IoT platforms require programmers to handle faults manually, a complex and error-prone task. In this paper, we present IoTRepair, a fault-handling system for IoT that (1)integrates a fault identification module to track faulty devices,(2) provides a library of fault-handling functions for effectively handling different fault types, (3) provides a fault handler on top of the library for autonomous IoT fault handling, with user and developer configuration as input. Through an evaluation in a simulated lab environment and with various fault injectio nmethods,IoTRepair is compared with current fault-handling solutions. The fault handler reduces the incorrect states on average 50.01%, which corresponds to less unsafe and insecure device states. Overall, through a systematic design of an IoT fault handler, we provide users flexibility and convenience in handling complex IoT fault handling, allowing safer IoT environments.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access