BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Amir Shpilka

Amir Shpilka contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Computational ComplexityInformation Theorymath.ITComputational Geometrymath.COData Structures and AlgorithmsDiscrete Mathematicsmath.AGquant-ph

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 21 - EmergingVerification L1Unclaimed author
12works
0followers
9topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

12 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Explicit and Efficient Constructions of linear Codes Against Adversarial Insertions and Deletions

In this work, we study linear error-correcting codes against adversarial insertion-deletion (insdel) errors, a topic that has recently gained a lot of attention. We construct linear codes over $\mathbb{F}_q$, for $q=\text{poly}(1/\varepsilon)$, that can efficiently decode from a $δ$ fraction of insdel errors and have rate $(1-4δ)/8-\varepsilon$. We also show that by allowing codes over $\mathbb{F}_{q^2}$ that are linear over $\mathbb{F}_q$, we can improve the rate to $(1-δ)/4-\varepsilon$ while not sacrificing efficiency. Using this latter result, we construct fully linear codes over $\mathbb{F}_2$ that can efficiently correct up to $δ< 1/54$ fraction of deletions and have rate $R = (1-54\cdot δ)/1216$. Cheng, Guruswami, Haeupler, and Li [CGHL21] constructed codes with (extremely small) rates bounded away from zero that can correct up to a $δ< 1/400$ fraction of insdel errors. They also posed the problem of constructing linear codes that get close to the half-Singleton bound (proved in [CGHL21]) over small fields. Thus, our results significantly improve their construction and get much closer to the bound.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Lower Bounds on Stabilizer Rank

The stabilizer rank of a quantum state $ψ$ is the minimal $r$ such that $\left| ψ\right \rangle = \sum_{j=1}^r c_j \left|φ_j \right\rangle$ for $c_j \in \mathbb{C}$ and stabilizer states $φ_j$. The running time of several classical simulation methods for quantum circuits is determined by the stabilizer rank of the $n$-th tensor power of single-qubit magic states. We prove a lower bound of $Ω(n)$ on the stabilizer rank of such states, improving a previous lower bound of $Ω(\sqrt{n})$ of Bravyi, Smith and Smolin (arXiv:1506.01396). Further, we prove that for a sufficiently small constant $δ$, the stabilizer rank of any state which is $δ$-close to those states is $Ω(\sqrt{n}/\log n)$. This is the first non-trivial lower bound for approximate stabilizer rank. Our techniques rely on the representation of stabilizer states as quadratic functions over affine subspaces of $\mathbb{F}_2^n$, and we use tools from analysis of boolean functions and complexity theory. The proof of the first result involves a careful analysis of directional derivatives of quadratic polynomials, whereas the proof of the second result uses Razborov-Smolensky low degree polynomial approximations and correlation bounds against the majority function.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

On Hardness of Testing Equivalence to Sparse Polynomials Under Shifts

We say that two given polynomials $f, g \in R[X]$, over a ring $R$, are equivalent under shifts if there exists a vector $a \in R^n$ such that $f(X+a) = g(X)$. Grigoriev and Karpinski (FOCS 1990), Lakshman and Saunders (SICOMP, 1995), and Grigoriev and Lakshman (ISSAC 1995) studied the problem of testing polynomial equivalence of a given polynomial to any $t$-sparse polynomial, over the rational numbers, and gave exponential time algorithms. In this paper, we provide hardness results for this problem. Formally, for a ring $R$, let $\mathrm{SparseShift}_R$ be the following decision problem. Given a polynomial $P(X)$, is there a vector $a$ such that $P(X+a)$ contains fewer monomials than $P(X)$. We show that $\mathrm{SparseShift}_R$ is at least as hard as checking if a given system of polynomial equations over $R[x_1,\ldots, x_n]$ has a solution (Hilbert&#39;s Nullstellensatz). As a consequence of this reduction, we get the following results. 1. $\mathrm{SparseShift}_\mathbb{Z}$ is undecidable. 2. For any ring $R$ (which is not a field) such that $\mathrm{HN}_R$ is $\mathrm{NP}_R$-complete over the Blum-Shub-Smale model of computation, $\mathrm{SparseShift}_{R}$ is also $\mathrm{NP}_{R}$-complete. In particular, $\mathrm{SparseShift}_{\mathbb{Z}}$ is also $\mathrm{NP}_{\mathbb{Z}}$-complete. We also study the gap version of the $\mathrm{SparseShift}_R$ and show the following. 1. For every function $β: \mathbb{N}\to\mathbb{R}_+$ such that $β\in o(1)$, $N^β$-gap-$\mathrm{SparseShift}_\mathbb{Z}$ is also undecidable (where $N$ is the input length). 2. For $R=\mathbb{F}_p, \mathbb{Q}, \mathbb{R}$ or $\mathbb{Z}_q$ and for every $β>1$ the $β$-gap-$\mathrm{SparseShift}_R$ problem is $\mathrm{NP}$-hard.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Reed Solomon Codes Against Adversarial Insertions and Deletions

In this work, we study the performance of Reed--Solomon codes against adversarial insertion-deletion (insdel) errors. We prove that over fields of size $n^{O(k)}$ there are $[n,k]$ Reed-Solomon codes that can decode from $n-2k+1$ insdel errors and hence attain the half-Singleton bound. We also give a deterministic construction of such codes over much larger fields (of size $n^{k^{O(k)}}$). Nevertheless, for $k=O(\log n /\log\log n)$ our construction runs in polynomial time. For the special case $k=2$, which received a lot of attention in the literature, we construct an $[n,2]$ Reed-Solomon code over a field of size $O(n^4)$ that can decode from $n-3$ insdel errors. Earlier constructions required an exponential field size. Lastly, we prove that any such construction requires a field of size $Ω(n^3)$.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Robust Sylvester-Gallai type theorem for quadratic polynomials

In this work, we extend the robust version of the Sylvester-Gallai theorem, obtained by Barak, Dvir, Wigderson and Yehudayoff, and by Dvir, Saraf and Wigderson, to the case of quadratic polynomials. Specifically, we prove that if $\mathcal{Q}\subset \mathbb{C}[x_1.\ldots,x_n]$ is a finite set, $|\mathcal{Q}|=m$, of irreducible quadratic polynomials that satisfy the following condition: There is $δ>0$ such that for every $Q\in\mathcal{Q}$ there are at least $δm$ polynomials $P\in \mathcal{Q}$ such that whenever $Q$ and $P$ vanish then so does a third polynomial in $\mathcal{Q}\setminus\{Q,P\}$, then $\dim(\text{span}({\mathcal{Q}}))=\text{poly}(1/δ)$. The work of Barak et al. and Dvir et al. studied the case of linear polynomials and proved an upper bound of $O(1/δ)$ on the dimension (in the first work an upper bound of $O(1/δ^2)$ was given, which was improved to $O(1/δ)$ in the second work).

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Tensor Reconstruction Beyond Constant Rank

We give reconstruction algorithms for subclasses of depth-3 arithmetic circuits. In particular, we obtain the first efficient algorithm for finding tensor rank, and an optimal tensor decomposition as a sum of rank-one tensors, when given black-box access to a tensor of super-constant rank. We obtain the following results: 1. A deterministic algorithm that reconstructs polynomials computed by $Σ^{[k]}\bigwedge^{[d]}Σ$ circuits in time $\mathsf{poly}(n,d,c) \cdot \mathsf{poly}(k)^{k^{k^{10}}}$ 2. A randomized algorithm that reconstructs polynomials computed by multilinear $Σ^{k]}\prod^{[d]}Σ$ circuits in time $\mathsf{poly}(n,d,c) \cdot k^{k^{k^{k^{O(k)}}}}$ 3. A randomized algorithm that reconstructs polynomials computed by set-multilinear $Σ^{k]}\prod^{[d]}Σ$ circuits in time $\mathsf{poly}(n,d,c) \cdot k^{k^{k^{k^{O(k)}}}}$, where $c=\log q$ if $\mathbb{F}=\mathbb{F}_q$ is a finite field, and $c$ equals the maximum bit complexity of any coefficient of $f$ if $\mathbb{F}$ is infinite. Prior to our work, polynomial time algorithms for the case when the rank, $k$, is constant, were given by Bhargava, Saraf and Volkovich [BSV21]. Another contribution of this work is correcting an error from a paper of Karnin and Shpilka [KS09] that affected Theorem 1.6 of [BSV21]. Consequently, the results of [KS09, BSV21] continue to hold, with a slightly worse setting of parameters. For fixing the error we study the relation between syntactic and semantic ranks of $ΣΠΣ$ circuits. We obtain our improvement by introducing a technique for learning rank preserving coordinate-subspaces. [KS09] and [BSV21] tried all choices of finding the &#34;correct&#34; coordinates, which led to having a fast growing function of $k$ at the exponent of $n$. We find these spaces in time that is growing fast with $k$, yet it is only a fixed polynomial in $n$.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

Hitting Sets and Reconstruction for Dense Orbits in $\text{VP}_e$ and $ΣΠΣ$ Circuits

In this paper we study polynomials in $\text{VP}_e$ (polynomial-sized formulas) and in $ΣΠΣ$ (polynomial-size depth-$3$ circuits) whose orbits, under the action of the affine group $\text{GL}_n^{\text{aff}}(\mathbb{F})$, are $\mathit{dense}$ in their ambient class. We construct hitting sets and interpolating sets for these orbits as well as give reconstruction algorithms. As $\text{VP}=\text{VNC}^2$, our results for $\text{VP}_e$ translate immediately to $\text{VP}$ with a quasipolynomial blow up in parameters. If any of our hitting or interpolating sets could be made $\mathit{robust}$ then this would immediately yield a hitting set for the superclass in which the relevant class is dense, and as a consequence also a lower bound for the superclass. Unfortunately, we also prove that the kind of constructions that we have found (which are defined in terms of $k$-independent polynomial maps) do not necessarily yield robust hitting sets.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

A generalized Sylvester-Gallai type theorem for quadratic polynomials

In this work we prove a version of the Sylvester-Gallai theorem for quadratic polynomials that takes us one step closer to obtaining a deterministic polynomial time algorithm for testing zeroness of $Σ^{[3]}ΠΣΠ^{[2]}$ circuits. Specifically, we prove that if a finite set of irreducible quadratic polynomials $\mathcal{Q}$ satisfy that for every two polynomials $Q_1,Q_2\in \mathcal{Q}$ there is a subset $\mathcal{K}\subset \mathcal{Q}$, such that $Q_1,Q_2 \notin \mathcal{K}$ and whenever $Q_1$ and $Q_2$ vanish then also $\prod_{i\in \mathcal{K}} Q_i$ vanishes, then the linear span of the polynomials in $\mathcal{Q}$ has dimension $O(1)$. This extends the earlier result [Shpilka19] that showed a similar conclusion when $|\mathcal{K}| = 1$. An important technical step in our proof is a theorem classifying all the possible cases in which a product of quadratic polynomials can vanish when two other quadratic polynomials vanish. I.e., when the product is in the radical of the ideal generates by the two quadratics. This step extends a result from [Shpilka19]that studied the case when one quadratic polynomial is in the radical of two other quadratics.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Polynomial time deterministic identity testingalgorithm for $Σ^{[3]}ΠΣΠ^{[2]}$ circuits via Edelstein-Kelly type theorem for quadratic polynomials

In this work we resolve conjectures of Beecken, Mitmann and Saxena [BMS13] and Gupta [Gup14], by proving an analog of a theorem of Edelstein and Kelly for quadratic polynomials. As immediate corollary we obtain the first deterministic polynomial time black-box algorithm for testing zeroness of $Σ^{[3]}ΠΣΠ^{[2]}$ circuits.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Reed-Muller Codes: Theory and Algorithms

Reed-Muller (RM) codes are among the oldest, simplest and perhaps most ubiquitous family of codes. They are used in many areas of coding theory in both electrical engineering and computer science. Yet, many of their important properties are still under investigation. This paper covers some of the recent developments regarding the weight enumerator and the capacity-achieving properties of RM codes, as well as some of the algorithmic developments. In particular, the paper discusses the recent connections established between RM codes, thresholds of Boolean functions, polarization theory, hypercontractivity, and the techniques of approximating low weight codewords using lower degree polynomials. It then overviews some of the algorithms with performance guarantees, as well as some of the algorithms with state-of-the-art performances in practical regimes. Finally, the paper concludes with a few open problems.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Sylvester-Gallai type theorems for quadratic polynomials

We prove Sylvester-Gallai type theorems for quadratic polynomials. Specifically, we prove that if a finite collection $\mathcal Q$, of irreducible polynomials of degree at most $2$, satisfy that for every two polynomials $Q_1,Q_2\in {\mathcal Q}$ there is a third polynomial $Q_3\in{\mathcal Q}$ so that whenever $Q_1$ and $Q_2$ vanish then also $Q_3$ vanishes, then the linear span of the polynomials in ${\mathcal Q}$ has dimension $O(1)$. We also prove a colored version of the theorem: If three finite sets of quadratic polynomials satisfy that for every two polynomials from distinct sets there is a polynomial in the third set satisfying the same vanishing condition then all polynomials are contained in an $O(1)$-dimensional space. This answers affirmatively two conjectures of Gupta [ECCC 2014] that were raised in the context of solving certain depth-$4$ polynomial identities. To obtain our main theorems we prove a new result classifying the possible ways that a quadratic polynomial $Q$ can vanish when two other quadratic polynomials vanish. Our proofs also require robust versions of a theorem of Edelstein and Kelly (that extends the Sylvester-Gallai theorem to colored sets).

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2010arXiv

On the Structure of Cubic and Quartic Polynomials

In this paper we study the structure of polynomials of degree three and four that have high bias or high Gowers norm, over arbitrary prime fields. In particular we obtain the following results. 1. We give a canonical representation for degree three or four polynomials that have a significant bias (i.e. they are not equidistributed). This result generalizes the corresponding results from the theory of quadratic forms. It also significantly improves the results of Green and Tao and Kaufman and Lovett for such polynomials. 2. For the case of degree four polynomials with high Gowers norm we show that (a subspace of co-dimension O(1) of) F^n can be partitioned to subspaces of dimension Omega(n) such that on each of the subspaces the polynomial is equal to some degree three polynomial. It was shown by Green and Tao and by Lovett, Meshulam and Samorodnitsky that a quartic polynomial with a high Gowers norm is not necessarily correlated with any cubic polynomial. Our result shows that a slightly weaker statement does hold. The proof is based on finding a structure in the space of partial derivatives of the underlying polynomial.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access