Subexponential Size Hitting Sets for Bounded Depth Multilinear Formulas

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Abstract

In this paper we give subexponential size hitting sets for bounded depth multilinear arithmetic formulas. Using the known relation between black-box PIT and lower bounds we obtain lower bounds for these models. For depth-3 multilinear formulas, of size exp⁡(nδ)\exp(n^δ), we give a hitting set of size exp⁡(O~(n2/3+2δ/3))\exp(\tilde{O}(n^{2/3 + 2δ/3})). This implies a lower bound of exp⁡(Ω~(n1/2))\exp(\tildeΩ(n^{1/2})) for depth-3 multilinear formulas, for some explicit polynomial. For depth-4 multilinear formulas, of size exp⁡(nδ)\exp(n^δ), we give a hitting set of size exp⁡(O~(n2/3+4δ/3))\exp(\tilde{O}(n^{2/3 + 4δ/3})). This implies a lower bound of exp⁡(Ω~(n1/4))\exp(\tildeΩ(n^{1/4})) for depth-4 multilinear formulas, for some explicit polynomial. A regular formula consists of alternating layers of +,×+,\times gates, where all gates at layer ii have the same fan-in. We give a hitting set of size (roughly) exp⁡(n1−δ)\exp\left(n^{1- δ} \right), for regular depth-dd multilinear formulas of size exp⁡(nδ)\exp(n^δ), where δ=O(15d)δ= O(\frac{1}{\sqrt{5}^d}). This result implies a lower bound of roughly exp⁡(Ω~(n15d))\exp(\tildeΩ(n^{\frac{1}{\sqrt{5}^d}})) for such formulas. We note that better lower bounds are known for these models, but also that none of these bounds was achieved via construction of a hitting set. Moreover, no lower bound that implies such PIT results, even in the white-box model, is currently known. Our results are combinatorial in nature and rely on reducing the underlying formula, first to a depth-4 formula, and then to a read-once algebraic branching program (from depth-3 formulas we go straight to read-once algebraic branching programs).

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.