Researcher profile

Allan Grønlund

Allan Grønlund contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
3works
0followers
4topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2020arXiv

Explaining the poor performance of the KASS algorithm implementation

By investigating the code for the KASS algorithm implementation used in the paper "Exploring the quantum speed limit with computer games" [1, arXiv:1506.09091] by Sørensen et al. (provided by the authors), we describe how the poor performance of the KASS algorithm reported in [1] is entirely caused by a simple sign error in a derivative calculation. Changing only this one sign in the KASS implementation, we show that the algorithm provides results comparable to all other algorithms considered for the problem [2,7], and performs better than all player solutions of [1]. Furthermore, we show that the player solutions were optimized with a different algorithm before being compared to the results from the KASS algorithm. The authors of [1] have acknowledged both findings. Finally, we show that in contrast to the claims in [1], the players did not explore two different strategies. In fact, all the players followed the same strategy.

preprint2020arXiv

Margin-Based Generalization Lower Bounds for Boosted Classifiers

Boosting is one of the most successful ideas in machine learning. The most well-accepted explanations for the low generalization error of boosting algorithms such as AdaBoost stem from margin theory. The study of margins in the context of boosting algorithms was initiated by Schapire, Freund, Bartlett and Lee (1998) and has inspired numerous boosting algorithms and generalization bounds. To date, the strongest known generalization (upper bound) is the $k$th margin bound of Gao and Zhou (2013). Despite the numerous generalization upper bounds that have been proved over the last two decades, nothing is known about the tightness of these bounds. In this paper, we give the first margin-based lower bounds on the generalization error of boosted classifiers. Our lower bounds nearly match the $k$th margin bound and thus almost settle the generalization performance of boosted classifiers in terms of margins.

preprint2020arXiv

Near-Tight Margin-Based Generalization Bounds for Support Vector Machines

Support Vector Machines (SVMs) are among the most fundamental tools for binary classification. In its simplest formulation, an SVM produces a hyperplane separating two classes of data using the largest possible margin to the data. The focus on maximizing the margin has been well motivated through numerous generalization bounds. In this paper, we revisit and improve the classic generalization bounds in terms of margins. Furthermore, we complement our new generalization bound by a nearly matching lower bound, thus almost settling the generalization performance of SVMs in terms of margins.