Researcher profile

Alfonso Veropalumbo

Alfonso Veropalumbo contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
3works
0followers
3topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Tracing the environmental history of observed galaxies via extended fast action minimization method

We present a novel application of the extended Fast Action Minimization method (eFAM) aimed at assessing the role of the environment in shaping galaxy evolution. We validate our approach by testing eFAM predictions against the Magneticum hydrodynamical simulation. We consider the z~0 snapshot of the simulation as our observed catalogue and use the reconstructed trajectories of galaxies to model the evolution of cosmic structures. At the statistical level, the fraction of volume (VFF) occupied by voids, sheets, filaments, and clusters in the reconstructed catalogues agrees within $1σ$ with the VFF estimated from the high-redshift snapshots of the simulation. The local accuracy of eFAM structures is evaluated by computing their purity with respect to the simulated catalogues, P, at the cells of a regular grid. Up to z=1.2, clusters have 0.58<P<0.93, filaments vary in 0.90<P<0.99, sheets show 0.78<P<0.92, and voids are best identified with 0.90<P<0.92. As redshift increases, comparing reconstructed tracers and simulated galaxies becomes more difficult due to their different biases and number densities and the purity decreases to P~0.6. We retrieve the environmental history of individual galaxies by tracing their trajectories through the cosmic web and relate their observed gas fraction, $f_\mathrm{gas}$, with the time spent within different structures. For galaxies in clusters and filaments, eFAM reproduces the variation of $f_\mathrm{gas}$ as a function of the redshift of accretion/infall as traced by the simulations with a 1.5 $σ$ statistical agreement (which decreases to 2.5 $σ$ statistical agreement for low-mass galaxies in filaments). These results support the application of eFAM to observational data to study the environmental dependence of observed galaxy properties, offering a complementary approach to that based on light-cone observations.

preprint2021arXiv

The XXL survey: XLVI. Forward cosmological analysis of the C1 cluster sample

We present the forward cosmological analysis of an $XMM$ selected sample of galaxy clusters out to a redshift of unity. Following our previous 2018 study based on the dn/dz quantity alone, we perform an upgraded cosmological analysis of the same XXL C1 cluster catalogue (178 objects), with a detailed account of the systematic errors. We follow the ASpiX methodology: the distribution of the observed X-ray properties of the cluster population is analysed in a 3D observable space (count rate, hardness ratio, redshift) and modelled as a function of cosmology. Compared to more traditional methods, ASpiX allows the inclusion of clusters down to a few tens of photons. We obtain an improvement by a factor of 2 compared to the previous analysis by letting the normalisation of the M-T relation and the evolution of the L-T relation free. Adding constraints from the XXL cluster 2-point correlation function and the BAO from various surveys decreases the uncertainties by 23 and 53 % respectively, and 62% when adding both. Switching to the scaling relations from the Subaru analysis, and letting free more parameters, our final constraints are $σ_8$ = $0.99^{+0.14}_{-0.23}$, $Ω_m$ = 0.296 $\pm$ 0.034 ($S_8 = 0.98^{+0.11}_{-0.21}$) for the XXL sample alone. Finally, we combine XXL ASpiX, the XXL cluster 2-point correlation function and the BAO, with 11 free parameters, allowing for the cosmological dependence of the scaling relations in the fit. We find $σ_8$ = $0.793^{+0.063}_{-0.12}$, $Ω_m$ = 0.364 $\pm$ 0.015 ($S_8 = 0.872^{+0.068}_{-0.12}$), but still compatible with Planck CMB at 2.2$σ$. The results obtained by the ASpiX method are promising; further improvement is expected from the final XXL cosmological analysis involving a cluster sample twice as large. Such a study paves the way for the analysis of the eROSITA and future Athena surveys.

preprint2020arXiv

Validating the methodology for constraining the linear growth rate from clustering anisotropies

Redshift-space clustering distortions provide one of the most powerful probes to test the gravity theory on the largest cosmological scales. We perform a systematic validation study of the state-of-the-art statistical methods currently used to constrain the linear growth rate from redshift-space distortions in the galaxy two-point correlation function. The numerical pipelines are tested on mock halo catalogues extracted from large N-body simulations of the standard cosmological framework. We consider both the monopole and quadrupole multipole moments of the redshift-space two-point correlation function, as well as the radial and transverse clustering wedges, in the comoving scale range $10<r[$\Mpch$]<55$. Moreover, we investigate the impact of redshift measurement errors on the growth rate and linear bias measurements due to the assumptions in the redshift-space distortion model. Considering both the dispersion model and two widely-used models based on perturbation theory, we find that the linear growth rate is underestimated by about $5-10\%$ at $z<1$, while limiting the analysis at larger scales, $r>30$ \Mpch, the discrepancy is reduced below $5\%$. At higher redshifts, we find instead an overall good agreement between measurements and model predictions. Though this accuracy is good enough for clustering analyses in current redshift surveys, the models have to be further improved not to introduce significant systematics in RSD constraints from next generation galaxy surveys. The effect of redshift errors is degenerate with the one of small-scale random motions, and can be marginalised over in the statistical analysis, not introducing any statistically significant bias in the linear growth constraints, especially at $z\geq1$.