Paper detail

Tracing the environmental history of observed galaxies via extended fast action minimization method

We present a novel application of the extended Fast Action Minimization method (eFAM) aimed at assessing the role of the environment in shaping galaxy evolution. We validate our approach by testing eFAM predictions against the Magneticum hydrodynamical simulation. We consider the z~0 snapshot of the simulation as our observed catalogue and use the reconstructed trajectories of galaxies to model the evolution of cosmic structures. At the statistical level, the fraction of volume (VFF) occupied by voids, sheets, filaments, and clusters in the reconstructed catalogues agrees within $1σ$ with the VFF estimated from the high-redshift snapshots of the simulation. The local accuracy of eFAM structures is evaluated by computing their purity with respect to the simulated catalogues, P, at the cells of a regular grid. Up to z=1.2, clusters have 0.58<P<0.93, filaments vary in 0.90<P<0.99, sheets show 0.78<P<0.92, and voids are best identified with 0.90<P<0.92. As redshift increases, comparing reconstructed tracers and simulated galaxies becomes more difficult due to their different biases and number densities and the purity decreases to P~0.6. We retrieve the environmental history of individual galaxies by tracing their trajectories through the cosmic web and relate their observed gas fraction, $f_\mathrm{gas}$, with the time spent within different structures. For galaxies in clusters and filaments, eFAM reproduces the variation of $f_\mathrm{gas}$ as a function of the redshift of accretion/infall as traced by the simulations with a 1.5 $σ$ statistical agreement (which decreases to 2.5 $σ$ statistical agreement for low-mass galaxies in filaments). These results support the application of eFAM to observational data to study the environmental dependence of observed galaxy properties, offering a complementary approach to that based on light-cone observations.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.