Source author record

Alexey Milovanov

Alexey Milovanov appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

6works
7topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

6 published item(s)

preprint2016arXiv

Some properties of antistochastic strings

Antistochastic strings are those strings that lack any reasonable statistical explanations. We establish the follow property of such strings: every absolutely non-stochastic string $x$ is "holographic" in the sense that it can be restored by a short program from any its part whose length equals the Kolmogorov complexity of $x$. Further we will show how it can be used for list decoding from erasing and for prove that symmetry of information fails for total conditional complexity.

preprint2015arXiv

Algorithmic statistics, prediction and machine learning

Algorithmic statistics considers the following problem: given a binary string $x$ (e.g., some experimental data), find a "good" explanation of this data. It uses algorithmic information theory to define formally what is a good explanation. In this paper we extend this framework in two directions. First, the explanations are not only interesting in themselves but also used for prediction: we want to know what kind of data we may reasonably expect in similar situations (repeating the same experiment). We show that some kind of hierarchy can be constructed both in terms of algorithmic statistics and using the notion of a priori probability, and these two approaches turn out to be equivalent. Second, a more realistic approach that goes back to machine learning theory, assumes that we have not a single data string $x$ but some set of "positive examples" $x_1,\ldots,x_l$ that all belong to some unknown set $A$, a property that we want to learn. We want this set $A$ to contain all positive examples and to be as small and simple as possible. We show how algorithmic statistic can be extended to cover this situation.

preprint2015arXiv

Algorithmic statistics: normal objects and universal models

Kolmogorov suggested to measure quality of a statistical hypothesis $P$ for a data $x$ by two parameters: Kolmogorov complexity $C(P)$ of the hypothesis and the probability $P(x)$ of $x$ with respect to $P$. P. Gács, J. Tromp, P.M.B. Vitányi discovered a small class of models that are universal in the following sense. Each hypothesis $S_{ij}$ from that class is identified by two integer parameters $i,j$ and for every data $x$ and for each complexity level $α$ there is a hypothesis $S_{ij}$ with $j\le i\le l(x)$ of complexity at most $α$ that has almost the best fit among all hypotheses of complexity at most $α$. The hypothesis $S_{ij}$ is identified by $i$ and the leading $i-j$ bits of the binary representation of the number of strings of complexity at most $i$. On the other hand, the initial data $x$ might be completely irrelevant to the the number of strings of complexity at most $i$. Thus $S_{ij}$ seems to have some information irrelevant to the data, which undermines Kolmogorov's approach: the best hypotheses should not have irrelevant information. To restrict the class of hypotheses for a data $x$ to those that have only relevant information, Vereshchagin introduced a notion of a strong model for $x$: those are models for $x$ whose total conditional complexity conditional to $x$ is negligible. An object $x$ is called normal if for each complexity level $α$ at least one its best fitting model of that complexity is strong. In this paper we show that there are "many types" of normal strings. Our second result states that there is a normal object $x$ such that all its best fitting models $S_{ij}$ are not strong for $x$. Our last result states that every best fit strong model for a normal object is again a normal object.