Source author record

Alan A. Stocker

Alan A. Stocker appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Artificial Intelligence Machine Learning Neurons and Cognition

Catalog footprint

What is connected

2works

3topics

2close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Open graph Browse works

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

preprint2016arXiv

Human Decision-Making under Limited Time

Subjective expected utility theory assumes that decision-makers possess unlimited computational resources to reason about their choices; however, virtually all decisions in everyday life are made under resource constraints - i.e. decision-makers are bounded in their rationality. Here we experimentally tested the predictions made by a formalization of bounded rationality based on ideas from statistical mechanics and information-theory. We systematically tested human subjects in their ability to solve combinatorial puzzles under different time limitations. We found that our bounded-rational model accounts well for the data. The decomposition of the fitted model parameter into the subjects' expected utility function and resource parameter provide interesting insight into the subjects' information capacity limits. Our results confirm that humans gradually fall back on their learned prior choice patterns when confronted with increasing resource limitations.

preprint2014arXiv

Biased perception leads to biased action: Validating a Bayesian model of interception

We tested whether and how biases in visual perception might influence motor actions. To do so, we designed an interception task in which subjects had to indicate the time when a moving object, whose trajectory was occluded, would reach a target area. Subjects made their judgments based on a brief display of the object's initial motion at a given starting point. Based on the known illusion that slow contrast stimuli appear to move slower than high contrast ones, we predict that if perception directly influences motion actions subjects would show delayed interception times for low contrast objects. In order to provide a more quantitative prediction, we developed a Bayesian model for the complete sensory-motor interception task. Using fit parameters for the prior and likelihood on visual speed from a previous study we were able to predict not only the expected interception times but also the precise characteristics of response variability. Psychophysical experiments confirm the model's predictions. Individual differences in subjects' timing responses can be accounted for by individual differences in the perceptual priors on visual speed. Taken together, our behavioral and model results show that biases in perception percolate downstream and cause action biases that are fully predictable.