Source author record

Akinari Hoshi

Explore this author’s publications, collaborators and research topics. This catalog record has not been claimed by its author.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

Research overview

15works
3topics
4close collaborators

Published work

15 publications

preprint2022arXiv

Davenport and Hasse's theorems and lifts of multiplication matrices of Gaussian periods

Let e≥2e \geq 2 be an integer, prp^r be a prime power with pr≡1 (mod e)p^r \equiv 1\ ({\rm mod}\ e) and ηr(i)η_r(i) be Gaussian periods of degree ee for Fpr{\mathbb F}_{p^r}. By the dual form of Davenport and Hasse's lifting theorem on Gauss sums, we establish lifts of the multiplication matrices of the Gaussian periods ηr(0),…,ηr(e−1)η_r(0),\ldots,η_r(e-1) which are defined by F. Thaine. We also give some examples of the explicit lifts for prime degree ee with 3≤e≤233\leq e\leq 23 which also illustrate relations among lifts of Jacobi sums, Gaussian periods and multiplication matrices of Gaussian periods.

preprint2022arXiv

Norm one tori and Hasse norm principle

Let kk be a field and TT be an algebraic kk-torus. In 1969, over a global field kk, Voskresenskii proved that there exists an exact sequence 0→A(T)→H1(k,Pic X‾)∨→Sha(T)→00\to A(T)\to H^1(k,{\rm Pic}\,\overline{X})^\vee\to Sha(T)\to 0 where A(T)A(T) is the kernel of the weak approximation of TT, Sha(T)Sha(T) is the Shafarevich-Tate group of TT, XX is a smooth kk-compactification of TT, X‾=X×kk‾\overline{X}=X\times_k\overline{k}, Pic X‾{\rm Pic}\,\overline{X} is the Picard group of X‾\overline{X} and ∨\vee stands for the Pontryagin dual. On the other hand, in 1963, Ono proved that for the norm one torus T=RK/k(1)(Gm)T=R^{(1)}_{K/k}(G_m) of K/kK/k, Sha(T)=0Sha(T)=0 if and only if the Hasse norm principle holds for K/kK/k. First, we determine H1(k,Pic X‾)H^1(k,{\rm Pic}\, \overline{X}) for algebraic kk-tori TT up to dimension 55. Second, we determine H1(k,Pic X‾)H^1(k,{\rm Pic}\, \overline{X}) for norm one tori T=RK/k(1)(Gm)T=R^{(1)}_{K/k}(G_m) with [K:k]=n≤15[K:k]=n\leq 15 and n≠12n\neq 12. We also show that H1(k,Pic X‾)=0H^1(k,{\rm Pic}\, \overline{X})=0 for T=RK/k(1)(Gm)T=R^{(1)}_{K/k}(G_m) when the Galois group of the Galois closure of K/kK/k is the Mathieu group Mn≤SnM_n\leq S_n with n=11,12,22,23,24n=11,12,22,23,24. Third, we give a necessary and sufficient condition for the Hasse norm principle for K/kK/k with [K:k]=n≤15[K:k]=n\leq 15 and n≠12n\neq 12. As applications of the results, we get the group T(k)/RT(k)/R of RR-equivalence classes over a local field kk via Colliot-Thélène and Sansuc's formula and the Tamagawa number τ(T)τ(T) over a number field kk via Ono's formula τ(T)=∣H1(k,T^)∣/∣Sha(T)∣τ(T)=|H^1(k,\widehat{T})|/|Sha(T)|.

preprint2014arXiv

Birational classification of fields of invariants for groups of order 128128

Let GG be a finite group acting on the rational function field C(xg:g∈G)\mathbb{C}(x_g : g\in G) by C\mathbb{C}-automorphisms h(xg)=xhgh(x_g)=x_{hg} for any g,h∈Gg,h\in G. Noether's problem asks whether the invariant field C(G)=k(xg:g∈G)G\mathbb{C}(G)=k(x_g : g\in G)^G is rational (i.e. purely transcendental) over C\mathbb{C}. Saltman and Bogomolov, respectively, showed that for any prime pp there exist groups GG of order p9p^9 and of order p6p^6 such that C(G)\mathbb{C}(G) is not rational over C\mathbb{C} by showing the non-vanishing of the unramified Brauer group: Brnr(C(G))≠0Br_{nr}(\mathbb{C}(G))\neq 0. For p=2p=2, Chu, Hu, Kang and Prokhorov proved that if GG is a 2-group of order ≤32\leq 32, then C(G)\mathbb{C}(G) is rational over C\mathbb{C}. Chu, Hu, Kang and Kunyavskii showed that if GG is of order 64, then C(G)\mathbb{C}(G) is rational over C\mathbb{C} except for the groups GG belonging to the two isoclinism families Φ13Φ_{13} and Φ16Φ_{16}. Bogomolov and Böhning's theorem claims that if G1G_1 and G2G_2 belong to the same isoclinism family, then C(G1)\mathbb{C}(G_1) and C(G2)\mathbb{C}(G_2) are stably C\mathbb{C}-isomorphic. We investigate the birational classification of C(G)\mathbb{C}(G) for groups GG of order 128 with Brnr(C(G))≠0Br_{nr}(\mathbb{C}(G))\neq 0. Moravec showed that there exist exactly 220 groups GG of order 128 with Brnr(C(G))≠0Br_{nr}(\mathbb{C}(G))\neq 0 forming 11 isoclinism families ΦjΦ_j. We show that if G1G_1 and G2G_2 belong to Φ16,Φ31,Φ37,Φ39,Φ43,Φ58,Φ60Φ_{16}, Φ_{31}, Φ_{37}, Φ_{39}, Φ_{43}, Φ_{58}, Φ_{60} or Φ80Φ_{80} (resp. Φ106Φ_{106} or Φ114Φ_{114}), then C(G1)\mathbb{C}(G_1) and C(G2)\mathbb{C}(G_2) are stably C\mathbb{C}-isomorphic with Brnr(C(Gi))≃C2Br_{nr}(\mathbb{C}(G_i))\simeq C_2. Explicit structures of non-rational fields C(G)\mathbb{C}(G) are given for each cases including also the case Φ30Φ_{30} with Brnr(C(G))≃C2×C2Br_{nr}(\mathbb{C}(G))\simeq C_2\times C_2.

preprint2014arXiv

Class Numbers and Algebraic Tori

Let pp be an odd prime number, DpD_p be the dihedral group of order 2p2p, hph_p and hp+h^+_p be the class numbers of Q(ζp)\bm{Q}(ζ_p) and Q(ζp+ζp−1)\bm{Q}(ζ_p+ ζ_p^{-1}) respectively. Theorem. hp+=1h_p^+=1 if and only if, for any field kk admitting a DpD_p-extension, all the algebraic DpD_p-tori over kk are stably rational. A similar result for hp=1h_p=1 and CpC_p-tori is valid also.

preprint2014arXiv

Noether's problems for groups of order 243

Let kk be any field, GG be a finite group. Let GG act on the rational function field k(xg:g∈G)k(x_g:g\in G) by kk-automorphisms defined by h⋅xg=xhgh\cdot x_g=x_{hg} for any g,h∈Gg,h\in G. Denote by k(G)=k(xg:g∈G)Gk(G)=k(x_g:g\in G)^G the fixed field. Noether's problem asks, under what situations, the fixed field k(G)k(G) will be rational (= purely transcendental) over kk. According to the data base of GAP there are 1010 isoclinism families for groups of order 243243. It is known that there are precisely 33 groups GG of order 243243 (they consist of the isoclinism family Φ10Φ_{10}) such that the unramified Brauer group of C(G)\bm{C}(G) over C\bm{C} is non-trivial. Thus C(G)\bm{C}(G) is not rational over C\bm{C}. We will prove that, if ζ9∈kζ_9 \in k, then k(G)k(G) is rational over kk for groups of order 243243 other than these 33 groups, except possibly for groups belonging to the isoclinism family Φ7Φ_7.

preprint2014arXiv

On Noether's problem for cyclic groups of prime order

Let kk be a field and GG be a finite group acting on the rational function field k(xg ∣ g∈G)k(x_g\,|\,g\in G) by kk-automorphisms h(xg)=xhgh(x_g)=x_{hg} for any g,h∈Gg,h\in G. Noether's problem asks whether the invariant field k(G)=k(xg ∣ g∈G)Gk(G)=k(x_g\,|\,g\in G)^G is rational (i.e. purely transcendental) over kk. In 1974, Lenstra gave a necessary and sufficient condition to this problem for abelian groups GG. However, even for the cyclic group CpC_p of prime order pp, it is unknown whether there exist infinitely many primes pp such that Q(Cp)\mathbb{Q}(C_p) is rational over Q\mathbb{Q}. Only known 1717 primes pp for which Q(Cp)\mathbb{Q}(C_p) is rational over Q\mathbb{Q} are p≤43p\leq 43 and p=61,67,71p=61,67,71. We show that for primes p<20000p< 20000, Q(Cp)\mathbb{Q}(C_p) is not (stably) rational over Q\mathbb{Q} except for affirmative 1717 primes and undetermined 4646 primes. Under the GRH, the generalized Riemann hypothesis, we also confirm that Q(Cp)\mathbb{Q}(C_p) is not (stably) rational over Q\mathbb{Q} for undetermined 2828 primes pp out of 4646.

preprint2012arXiv

Noether's problem and unramified Brauer groups

Let kk be any field, GG be a finite group acing on the rational function field k(xg:g∈G)k(x_g:g\in G) by h⋅xg=xhgh\cdot x_g=x_{hg} for any h,g∈Gh,g\in G. Define k(G)=k(xg:g∈G)Gk(G)=k(x_g:g\in G)^G. Noether's problem asks whether k(G)k(G) is rational (= purely transcendental) over kk. It is known that, if C(G)\bm{C}(G) is rational over C\bm{C}, then B0(G)=0B_0(G)=0 where B0(G)B_0(G) is the unramified Brauer group of C(G)\bm{C}(G) over C\bm{C}. Bogomolov showed that, if GG is a pp-group of order p5p^5, then B0(G)=0B_0(G)=0. This result was disproved by Moravec for p=3,5,7p=3,5,7 by computer calculations. We will prove the following theorem. Theorem. Let pp be any odd prime number, GG be a group of order p5p^5. Then B0(G)≠0B_0(G)\ne 0 if and only if GG belongs to the isoclinism family Φ10Φ_{10} in R. James's classification of groups of order p5p^5.

preprint2011arXiv

On correspondence between solutions of a family of cubic Thue equations and isomorphism classes of the simplest cubic fields

Let m≥−1m\geq -1 be an integer. We give a correspondence between integer solutions to the parametric family of cubic Thue equations X3−mX2Y−(m+3)XY2−Y3=λ X^3-mX^2Y-(m+3)XY^2-Y^3=λ where λ>0λ>0 is a divisor of m2+3m+9m^2+3m+9 and isomorphism classes of the simplest cubic fields. By the correspondence and R. Okazaki's result, we determine the exactly 66 non-trivial solutions to the Thue equations for positive divisors λλ of m2+3m+9m^2+3m+9. As a consequence, we obtain another proof of Okazaki's theorem which asserts that the simplest cubic fields are non-isomorphic to each other except for m=−1,0,1,2,3,5,12,54,66,1259,2389m=-1,0,1,2,3,5,12,54,66,1259,2389.

preprint2011arXiv

Rationality problem of three-dimensional monomial group actions

Let KK be a field of characteristic not two and K(x,y,z)K(x,y,z) the rational function field over KK with three variables x,y,zx,y,z. Let GG be a finite group of acting on K(x,y,z)K(x,y,z) by monomial KK-automorphisms. We consider the rationality problem of the fixed field K(x,y,z)GK(x,y,z)^G under the action of GG, namely whether K(x,y,z)GK(x,y,z)^G is rational (that is, purely transcendental) over KK or not. We may assume that GG is a subgroup of GL(3,Z)andtheproblemisdetermineduptoconjugacyin\mathrm{GL}(3,\mathbb{Z}) and the problem is determined up to conjugacy in \mathrm{GL}(3,\mathbb{Z}).Thereare73conjugacyclassesof. There are 73 conjugacy classes of Gin in \mathrm{GL}(3,\mathbb{Z}).ByresultsofEndo−Miyata,Voskresenskiı˘,Lenstra,Saltman,Hajja,KangandYamasaki,8conjugacyclassesof2−groupsin. By results of Endo-Miyata, Voskresenski\uı, Lenstra, Saltman, Hajja, Kang and Yamasaki, 8 conjugacy classes of 2-groups in \mathrm{GL}(3,\mathbb{Z})havenegativeanswerstotheproblemundercertainmonomialactionsoversomebasefield have negative answers to the problem under certain monomial actions over some base field K,andthenecessaryandsufficientconditionfortherationalityof, and the necessary and sufficient condition for the rationality of K(x,y,z)^Gover over Kisgiven.Inthispaper,weshowthatthefixedfield is given. In this paper, we show that the fixed field K(x,y,z)^Gundermonomialactionof under monomial action of Gisrationalover is rational over Kexceptforpossiblynegative8casesof2−groupsandunknownonecaseofthealternatinggroupofdegreefour.Moreoverwegiveexplicittranscendentalbasesofthefixedfieldsover except for possibly negative 8 cases of 2-groups and unknown one case of the alternating group of degree four. Moreover we give explicit transcendental bases of the fixed fields over K.Forunknowncase,weobtainanaffirmativesolutiontotheproblemundersomeconditions.Inparticular,weshowthatif. For unknown case, we obtain an affirmative solution to the problem under some conditions. In particular, we show that if Kisquadraticallyclosedfieldthen is quadratically closed field then K(x,y,z)^Gisrationalover is rational over K$. We also give an application of the result to 4-dimensional linear Noether's problem.

preprint2011arXiv

Unramified Brauer groups for groups of order p^5

Let kk be any field, GG be a finite group acting on the rational function field k(xg:g∈G)k(x_g : g\in G) by h⋅xg=xhgh\cdot x_g=x_{hg} for any h,g∈Gh,g\in G. Define k(G)=k(xg:g∈G)Gk(G)=k(x_g : g\in G)^G. Noether's problem asks whether k(G)k(G) is rational (= purely transcendental) over kk. It is known that, if $\bC(G)$ is rational over $\bC$, then B0(G)=0B_0(G)=0 where B0(G)B_0(G) is the unramified Brauer group of $\bC(G)$ over $\bC$. Bogomolov showed that, if GG is a pp-group of order p5p^5, then B0(G)=0B_0(G)=0. This result was disproved by Moravec for p=3,5,7p=3,5,7 by computer computing. We will give a theoretic proof of the following theorem (i.e. by the traditional bare-hand proof without using computers). Theorem. Let pp be any odd prime number. Then there is a group GG of order p5p^5 satisfying B0(G)≠0B_0(G)\neq 0 and G/[G,G]≃Cp×CpG/[G,G] \simeq C_p \times C_p. In particular, $\bC(G)$ is not rational over $\bC$.

preprint2010arXiv

On the simplest quartic fields and related Thue equations

Let KK be a field of char K≠2K\neq 2. For a∈Ka\in K, we give an explicit answer to the field isomorphism problem of the simplest quartic polynomial X4−aX3−6X2+aX+1X^4-aX^3-6X^2+aX+1 over KK as the special case of the field intersection problem via multi-resolvent polynomials. From this result, over an infinite field KK, we see that the polynomial gives the same splitting field over KK for infinitely many values aa of KK. We also see by Siegel's theorem for curves of genus zero that only finitely many algebraic integers a∈OKa\in\mathcal{O}_K in a number field KK may give the same splitting field. By applying the result over the field Q\mathbb{Q} of rational numbers, we establish a correspondence between primitive solutions to the parametric family of quartic Thue equations X4−mX3Y−6X2Y2+mXY3+Y4=c, X^4-mX^3Y-6X^2Y^2+mXY^3+Y^4=c, where m∈Zm\in\mathbb{Z} is a rational integer and cc is a divisor of 4(m2+16)4(m^2+16), and isomorphism classes of the simplest quartic fields.

preprint2010arXiv

On the simplest sextic fields and related Thue equations

We consider the parametric family of sextic Thue equations x6−2mx5y−5(m+3)x4y2−20x3y3+5mx2y4+2(m+3)xy5+y6=λ x^6-2mx^5y-5(m+3)x^4y^2-20x^3y^3+5mx^2y^4+2(m+3)xy^5+y^6=λ where m∈Zm\in\mathbb{Z} is an integer and λλ is a divisor of 27(m2+3m+9)27(m^2+3m+9). We show that the only solutions to the equations are the trivial ones with xy(x+y)(x−y)(x+2y)(2x+y)=0xy(x+y)(x-y)(x+2y)(2x+y)=0.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.