Source author record

Aiichi Yamasaki

Aiichi Yamasaki appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

7works
2topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

7 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Norm one tori and Hasse norm principle

Let $k$ be a field and $T$ be an algebraic $k$-torus. In 1969, over a global field $k$, Voskresenskii proved that there exists an exact sequence $0\to A(T)\to H^1(k,{\rm Pic}\,\overline{X})^\vee\to Sha(T)\to 0$ where $A(T)$ is the kernel of the weak approximation of $T$, $Sha(T)$ is the Shafarevich-Tate group of $T$, $X$ is a smooth $k$-compactification of $T$, $\overline{X}=X\times_k\overline{k}$, ${\rm Pic}\,\overline{X}$ is the Picard group of $\overline{X}$ and $\vee$ stands for the Pontryagin dual. On the other hand, in 1963, Ono proved that for the norm one torus $T=R^{(1)}_{K/k}(G_m)$ of $K/k$, $Sha(T)=0$ if and only if the Hasse norm principle holds for $K/k$. First, we determine $H^1(k,{\rm Pic}\, \overline{X})$ for algebraic $k$-tori $T$ up to dimension $5$. Second, we determine $H^1(k,{\rm Pic}\, \overline{X})$ for norm one tori $T=R^{(1)}_{K/k}(G_m)$ with $[K:k]=n\leq 15$ and $n\neq 12$. We also show that $H^1(k,{\rm Pic}\, \overline{X})=0$ for $T=R^{(1)}_{K/k}(G_m)$ when the Galois group of the Galois closure of $K/k$ is the Mathieu group $M_n\leq S_n$ with $n=11,12,22,23,24$. Third, we give a necessary and sufficient condition for the Hasse norm principle for $K/k$ with $[K:k]=n\leq 15$ and $n\neq 12$. As applications of the results, we get the group $T(k)/R$ of $R$-equivalence classes over a local field $k$ via Colliot-Thélène and Sansuc's formula and the Tamagawa number $τ(T)$ over a number field $k$ via Ono's formula $τ(T)=|H^1(k,\widehat{T})|/|Sha(T)|$.

preprint2015arXiv

Rationality problem of conic bundles

Let $k$ be a field with char $k \not= 2$, $X$ be an affine surface defined by the equation $z^2=P(x)y^2+Q(x)$ where $P(x), Q(x) \in k[x]$ are separable polynomials. We will investigate the rationality problem of $X$ in terms of the polynomials $P(x)$ and $Q(x)$. The necessary and sufficient condition is $s \leq 3$ with minor exceptions, where $s=s_1+s_2+s_3+s_4$, $s_1$ (resp. $s_2$, resp. $s_3$) being the number of $c \in \overline{k}$ such that $P(c)=0$ and $Q(c) \not\in k(c)^2$ (resp. $Q(c)=0$ and $P(c) \not\in k(c)^2$, resp. $P(c)=Q(c)=0$ and $-\frac{Q}{P}(c) \not\in k(c)^2$). $s_4=0$ or $1$ according to the behavior at $x=\infty$. $X$ is a conic bundle over $\mathbb{P}_k^1$, whose rationality was studied by Iskovskikh. Iskovskikh formulated his results in geometric language. This paper aims to give an algebraic counterpart.

preprint2013arXiv

Rationality problem of generalized Châtelet surfaces

The surface $z^2=ay^2+P(x), \, a \in k, \, P(x) \in k[x]$ is not $k$-rational, if $a \not\in k^2$ and $P(x)$ satisfies some conditions. This result essentially due to Iskovskih but his statement is in terms of algebraic geometry, and not so easy to access for the researchers of the field extension. This paper aims to give a formulation accessible more easily. A necessary and sufficient condition for $k$-rationality is given in terms of $a$ and $P$, assuming that $\ch k \not= 2$ and every irreducible component of $P(x)$ is separable over $k$.

preprint2011arXiv

Rationality problem of three-dimensional monomial group actions

Let $K$ be a field of characteristic not two and $K(x,y,z)$ the rational function field over $K$ with three variables $x,y,z$. Let $G$ be a finite group of acting on $K(x,y,z)$ by monomial $K$-automorphisms. We consider the rationality problem of the fixed field $K(x,y,z)^G$ under the action of $G$, namely whether $K(x,y,z)^G$ is rational (that is, purely transcendental) over $K$ or not. We may assume that $G$ is a subgroup of $\mathrm{GL}(3,\mathbb{Z}) and the problem is determined up to conjugacy in $\mathrm{GL}(3,\mathbb{Z})$. There are 73 conjugacy classes of $G$ in $\mathrm{GL}(3,\mathbb{Z})$. By results of Endo-Miyata, Voskresenski\uı, Lenstra, Saltman, Hajja, Kang and Yamasaki, 8 conjugacy classes of 2-groups in $\mathrm{GL}(3,\mathbb{Z})$ have negative answers to the problem under certain monomial actions over some base field $K$, and the necessary and sufficient condition for the rationality of $K(x,y,z)^G$ over $K$ is given. In this paper, we show that the fixed field $K(x,y,z)^G$ under monomial action of $G$ is rational over $K$ except for possibly negative 8 cases of 2-groups and unknown one case of the alternating group of degree four. Moreover we give explicit transcendental bases of the fixed fields over $K$. For unknown case, we obtain an affirmative solution to the problem under some conditions. In particular, we show that if $K$ is quadratically closed field then $K(x,y,z)^G$ is rational over $K$. We also give an application of the result to 4-dimensional linear Noether's problem.