Paper detail

On the simplest quartic fields and related Thue equations

Let $K$ be a field of char $K\neq 2$. For $a\in K$, we give an explicit answer to the field isomorphism problem of the simplest quartic polynomial $X^4-aX^3-6X^2+aX+1$ over $K$ as the special case of the field intersection problem via multi-resolvent polynomials. From this result, over an infinite field $K$, we see that the polynomial gives the same splitting field over $K$ for infinitely many values $a$ of $K$. We also see by Siegel's theorem for curves of genus zero that only finitely many algebraic integers $a\in\mathcal{O}_K$ in a number field $K$ may give the same splitting field. By applying the result over the field $\mathbb{Q}$ of rational numbers, we establish a correspondence between primitive solutions to the parametric family of quartic Thue equations \[ X^4-mX^3Y-6X^2Y^2+mXY^3+Y^4=c, \] where $m\in\mathbb{Z}$ is a rational integer and $c$ is a divisor of $4(m^2+16)$, and isomorphism classes of the simplest quartic fields.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.