Source author record

Agham Posadas

Agham Posadas appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

1works
1topics
3close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

1 published item(s)

preprint2015arXiv

Final-state effect on x-ray photoelectron spectrum of nominally $d^1$ and $n$-doped $d^0$ transition metal oxides

We investigate the x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) of nominally $d^1$ and $n$-doped $d^0$ transition metal oxides including NbO$_2$, SrVO$_3$, and LaTiO$_3$ (nominally $d^1$), as well as $n$-doped SrTiO$_3$ (nominally $d^0$). In the case of single phase $d^1$ oxides, we find that the XPS spectra (specifically photoelectrons from Nb $3d$, V $2p$, Ti $2p$ core levels) all display at least two, and sometimes three distinct components, which can be consistently identified as $d^0$, $d^1$, and $d^2$ oxidation states (with decreasing order in binding energy). Electron doping increases the $d^2$ component but decreases the $d^0$ component, whereas hole doping reverses this trend; a single $d^1$ peak is never observed, and the $d^0$ peak is always present even in phase-pure samples. In the case of $n$-doped SrTiO$_3$, the $d^1$ component appears as a weak shoulder with respect to the main $d^0$ peak. We argue that these multiple peaks should be understood as being due to the final-state effect and are intrinsic to the materials. Their presence does not necessarily imply the existence of spatially localized ions of different oxidation states nor of separate phases. A simple model is provided to illustrate this interpretation, and several experiments are discussed accordingly. The key parameter to determine the relative importance between the initial-state and final-state effects is also pointed out.