Researcher profile

Adam Wang

Adam Wang contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 11 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
1works
0followers
1topics
2close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

1 published item(s)

preprint2020arXiv

Detective quantum efficiency of photon-counting CdTe and Si detectors for computed tomography: a simulation study

Purpose: Developing photon-counting CT detectors requires understanding the impact of parameters such as converter material, absorption length and pixel size. We apply a novel linear-systems framework, incorporating spatial and energy resolution, to study realistic silicon (Si) and cadmium telluride (CdTe) detectors at low count rate. Approach: We compared CdTe detector designs with $0.5\times0.5\; \mathrm{mm}^2$ and $0.225\times0.225\; \mathrm{mm}^2$ pixels and Si detector designs with $0.5\times0.5\; \mathrm{mm}^2$ pixels of 30 and 60 mm active absorption length, with and without tungsten scatter blockers. Monte-Carlo simulations of photon transport were used together with Gaussian charge sharing models fitted to published data. Results: For detection in a 300 mm thick object at 120 kVp, the 0.5 mm and 0.225 mm pixel CdTe systems have 28-41 $\%$ and 5-29 $\%$ higher DQE, respectively, than the 60 mm Si system with tungsten, whereas the corresponding numbers for two-material decomposition are 2 $\%$ lower to 11 $\%$ higher DQE and 31-54 $\%$ lower DQE compared to Si. We also show that combining these detectors with dual-spectrum acquisition is beneficial. Conclusions: In the low-count-rate regime, CdTe detector systems outperform the Si systems for detection tasks, while silicon outperforms one or both of the CdTe systems for material decomposition.