BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Adam Polak

Adam Polak contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Data Structures and AlgorithmsComputational ComplexityMachine Learningcs.CYDiscrete Mathematicseess.SPHuman-Computer Interaction

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 21 - EmergingVerification L1Unclaimed author
7works
0followers
7topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

7 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Learning-Augmented Maximum Flow

We propose a framework for speeding up maximum flow computation by using predictions. A prediction is a flow, i.e., an assignment of non-negative flow values to edges, which satisfies the flow conservation property, but does not necessarily respect the edge capacities of the actual instance (since these were unknown at the time of learning). We present an algorithm that, given an $m$-edge flow network and a predicted flow, computes a maximum flow in $O(mη)$ time, where $η$ is the $\ell_1$ error of the prediction, i.e., the sum over the edges of the absolute difference between the predicted and optimal flow values. Moreover, we prove that, given an oracle access to a distribution over flow networks, it is possible to efficiently PAC-learn a prediction minimizing the expected $\ell_1$ error over that distribution. Our results fit into the recent line of research on learning-augmented algorithms, which aims to improve over worst-case bounds of classical algorithms by using predictions, e.g., machine-learned from previous similar instances. So far, the main focus in this area was on improving competitive ratios for online problems. Following Dinitz et al. (NeurIPS 2021), our results are one of the firsts to improve the running time of an offline problem.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Memoryless Worker-Task Assignment with Polylogarithmic Switching Cost

We study the basic problem of assigning memoryless workers to tasks with dynamically changing demands. Given a set of $w$ workers and a multiset $T \subseteq[t]$ of $|T|=w$ tasks, a memoryless worker-task assignment function is any function $ϕ$ that assigns the workers $[w]$ to the tasks $T$ based only on the current value of $T$. The assignment function $ϕ$ is said to have switching cost at most $k$ if, for every task multiset $T$, changing the contents of $T$ by one task changes $ϕ(T)$ by at most $k$ worker assignments. The goal of memoryless worker task assignment is to construct an assignment function with the smallest possible switching cost. In past work, the problem of determining the optimal switching cost has been posed as an open question. There are no known sub-linear upper bounds, and after considerable effort, the best known lower bound remains 4 (ICALP 2020). We show that it is possible to achieve polylogarithmic switching cost. We give a construction via the probabilistic method that achieves switching cost $O(\log w \log (wt))$ and an explicit construction that achieves switching cost $\operatorname{polylog} (wt)$. We also prove a super-constant lower bound on switching cost: we show that for any value of $w$, there exists a value of $t$ for which the optimal switching cost is $w$. Thus it is not possible to achieve a switching cost that is sublinear strictly as a function of $w$. Finally, we present an application of the worker-task assignment problem to a metric embeddings problem. In particular, we use our results to give the first low-distortion embedding from sparse binary vectors into low-dimensional Hamming space.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Tight Vector Bin Packing with Few Small Items via Fast Exact Matching in Multigraphs

We solve the Bin Packing problem in $O^*(2^k)$ time, where $k$ is the number of items less or equal to one third of the bin capacity. This parameter measures the distance from the polynomially solvable case of only large (i.e., greater than one third) items. Our algorithm is actually designed to work for a more general Vector Bin Packing problem, in which items are multidimensional vectors. We improve over the previous fastest $O^*(k! \cdot 4^k)$ time algorithm. Our algorithm works by reducing the problem to finding an exact weight perfect matching in a (multi-)graph with $O^*(2^k)$ edges, whose weights are integers of the order of $O^*(2^k)$. To solve the matching problem in the desired time, we give a variant of the classic Mulmuley-Vazirani-Vazirani algorithm with only a linear dependence on the edge weights and the number of edges, which may be of independent interest. Moreover, we give a tight lower bound, under the Strong Exponential Time Hypothesis (SETH), showing that the constant $2$ in the base of the exponent cannot be further improved for Vector Bin Packing. Our techniques also lead to improved algorithms for Vector Multiple Knapsack, Vector Bin Covering, and Perfect Matching with Hitting Constraints.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Emotion Recognition Using Wearables: A Systematic Literature Review Work in progress

Wearables like smartwatches or wrist bands equipped with pervasive sensors enable us to monitor our physiological signals. In this study, we address the question whether they can help us to recognize our emotions in our everyday life for ubiquitous computing. Using the systematic literature review, we identified crucial research steps and discussed the main limitations and problems in the domain.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Equivalences between triangle and range query problems

We define a natural class of range query problems, and prove that all problems within this class have the same time complexity (up to polylogarithmic factors). The equivalence is very general, and even applies to online algorithms. This allows us to obtain new improved algorithms for all of the problems in the class. We then focus on the special case of the problems when the queries are offline and the number of queries is linear. We show that our range query problems are runtime-equivalent (up to polylogarithmic factors) to counting for each edge $e$ in an $m$-edge graph the number of triangles through $e$. This natural triangle problem can be solved using the best known triangle counting algorithm, running in $O(m^{2ω/(ω+1)}) \leq O(m^{1.41})$ time. Moreover, if $ω=2$, the $O(m^{2ω/(ω+1)})$ running time is known to be tight (within $m^{o(1)}$ factors) under the 3SUM Hypothesis. In this case, our equivalence settles the complexity of the range query problems. Our problems constitute the first equivalence class with this peculiar running time bound. To better understand the complexity of these problems, we also provide a deeper insight into the family of triangle problems, in particular showing black-box reductions between triangle listing and per-edge triangle detection and counting. As a byproduct of our reductions, we obtain a simple triangle listing algorithm matching the state-of-the-art for all regimes of the number of triangles. We also give some not necessarily tight, but still surprising reductions from variants of matrix products, such as the $(\min,\max)$-product.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2017arXiv

Tight Conditional Lower Bounds for Longest Common Increasing Subsequence

We consider the canonical generalization of the well-studied Longest Increasing Subsequence problem to multiple sequences, called $k$-LCIS: Given $k$ integer sequences $X_1,\dots,X_k$ of length at most $n$, the task is to determine the length of the longest common subsequence of $X_1,\dots,X_k$ that is also strictly increasing. Especially for the case of $k=2$ (called LCIS for short), several algorithms have been proposed that require quadratic time in the worst case. Assuming the Strong Exponential Time Hypothesis (SETH), we prove a tight lower bound, specifically, that no algorithm solves LCIS in (strongly) subquadratic time. Interestingly, the proof makes no use of normalization tricks common to hardness proofs for similar problems such as LCS. We further strengthen this lower bound (1) to rule out $O((nL)^{1-\varepsilon})$ time algorithms for LCIS, where $L$ denotes the solution size, (2) to rule out $O(n^{k-\varepsilon})$ time algorithms for $k$-LCIS, and (3) to follow already from weaker variants of SETH. We obtain the same conditional lower bounds for the related Longest Common Weakly Increasing Subsequence problem.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2017arXiv

Why is it hard to beat $O(n^2)$ for Longest Common Weakly Increasing Subsequence?

The Longest Common Weakly Increasing Subsequence problem (LCWIS) is a variant of the classic Longest Common Subsequence problem (LCS). Both problems can be solved with simple quadratic time algorithms. A recent line of research led to a number of matching conditional lower bounds for LCS and other related problems. However, the status of LCWIS remained open. In this paper we show that LCWIS cannot be solved in strongly subquadratic time unless the Strong Exponential Time Hypothesis (SETH) is false. The ideas which we developed can also be used to obtain a lower bound based on a safer assumption of NC-SETH, i.e. a version of SETH which talks about NC circuits instead of less expressive CNF formulas.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access