BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

A. Philip Dawid

A. Philip Dawid contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
math.STStatistics TheoryMethodologyApplicationsMachine Learning

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 21 - EmergingVerification L1Unclaimed author
13works
0followers
5topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

13 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

On Learnability under General Stochastic Processes

Statistical learning theory under independent and identically distributed (iid) sampling and online learning theory for worst case individual sequences are two of the best developed branches of learning theory. Statistical learning under general non-iid stochastic processes is less mature. We provide two natural notions of learnability of a function class under a general stochastic process. We show that both notions are in fact equivalent to online learnability. Our results hold for both binary classification and regression.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Decision-theoretic foundations for statistical causality

We develop a mathematical and interpretative foundation for the enterprise of decision-theoretic statistical causality (DT), which is a straightforward way of representing and addressing causal questions. DT reframes causal inference as "assisted decision-making", and aims to understand when, and how, I can make use of external data, typically observational, to help me solve a decision problem by taking advantage of assumed relationships between the data and my problem. The relationships embodied in any representation of a causal problem require deeper justification, which is necessarily context-dependent. Here we clarify the considerations needed to support applications of the DT methodology. Exchangeability considerations are used to structure the required relationships, and a distinction drawn between intention to treat and intervention to treat forms the basis for the enabling condition of "ignorability". We also show how the DT perspective unifies and sheds light on other popular formalisations of statistical causality, including potential responses and directed acyclic graphs.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2017arXiv

A Note on Bayesian Model Selection for Discrete Data Using Proper Scoring Rules

We consider the problem of choosing between parametric models for a discrete observable, taking a Bayesian approach in which the within-model prior distributions are allowed to be improper. In order to avoid the ambiguity in the marginal likelihood function in such a case, we apply a homogeneous scoring rule. For the particular case of distinguishing between Poisson and Negative Binomial models, we conduct simulations that indicate that, applied prequentially, the method will consistently select the true model.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2017arXiv

A Note on Prediction Markets

In a prediction market, individuals can sequentially place bets on the outcome of a future event. This leaves a trail of personal probabilities for the event, each being conditional on the current individual's private background knowledge and on the previously announced probabilities of other individuals, which give partial information about their private knowledge. By means of theory and examples, we revisit some results in this area. In particular, we consider the case of two individuals, who start with the same overall probability distribution but different private information, and then take turns in updating their probabilities. We note convergence of the announced probabilities to a limiting value, which may or may not be the same as that based on pooling their private information.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

A Commentary on Statistical Assessment of Violence Recidivism Risk

Increasing integration and availability of data on large groups of persons has been accompanied by proliferation of statistical and other algorithmic prediction tools in banking, insurance, marketiNg, medicine, and other FIelds (see e.g., Steyerberg (2009a;b)). Controversy may ensue when such tools are introduced to fields traditionally reliant on individual clinical evaluations. Such controversy has arisen about "actuarial" assessments of violence recidivism risk, i.e., the probability that someone found to have committed a violent act will commit another during a specified period. Recently Hart et al. (2007a) and subsequent papers from these authors in several reputable journals have claimed to demonstrate that statistical assessments of such risks are inherently too imprecise to be useful, using arguments that would seem to apply to statistical risk prediction quite broadly. This commentary examines these arguments from a technical statistical perspective, and finds them seriously mistaken in many particulars. They should play no role in reasoned discussions of violence recidivism risk assessment.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Bayesian Model Selection Based on Proper Scoring Rules

Bayesian model selection with improper priors is not well-defined because of the dependence of the marginal likelihood on the arbitrary scaling constants of the within-model prior densities. We show how this problem can be evaded by replacing marginal log-likelihood by a homogeneous proper scoring rule, which is insensitive to the scaling constants. Suitably applied, this will typically enable consistent selection of the true model.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Extended Conditional Independence and Applications in Causal Inference

The goal of this paper is to integrate the notions of stochastic conditional independence and variation conditional independence under a more general notion of extended conditional independence. We show that under appropriate assumptions the calculus that applies for the two cases separately (axioms of a separoid) still applies for the extended case. These results provide a rigorous basis for a wide range of statistical concepts, including ancillarity and sufficiency, and, in particular, the Decision Theoretic framework for statistical causality, which uses the language and calculus of conditional independence in order to express causal properties and make causal inferences.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Structural Markov graph laws for Bayesian model uncertainty

This paper considers the problem of defining distributions over graphical structures. We propose an extension of the hyper Markov properties of Dawid and Lauritzen [Ann. Statist. 21 (1993) 1272-1317], which we term structural Markov properties, for both undirected decomposable and directed acyclic graphs, which requires that the structure of distinct components of the graph be conditionally independent given the existence of a separating component. This allows the analysis and comparison of multiple graphical structures, while being able to take advantage of the common conditional independence constraints. Moreover, we show that these properties characterise exponential families, which form conjugate priors under sampling from compatible Markov distributions.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

On Individual Risk

We survey a variety of possible explications of the term "Individual Risk." These in turn are based on a variety of interpretations of "Probability," including Classical, Enumerative, Frequency, Formal, Metaphysical, Personal, Propensity, Chance and Logical conceptions of Probability, which we review and compare. We distinguish between "groupist" and "individualist" understandings of Probability, and explore both "group to individual" (G2i) and "individual to group" (i2G) approaches to characterising Individual Risk. Although in the end that concept remains subtle and elusive, some pragmatic suggestions for progress are made.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

Statistical Causality from a Decision-Theoretic Perspective

We present an overview of the decision-theoretic framework of statistical causality, which is well-suited for formulating and solving problems of determining the effects of applied causes. The approach is described in detail, and is related to and contrasted with other current formulations, such as structural equation models and potential responses. Topics and applications covered include confounding, the effect of treatment on the treated, instrumental variables, and dynamic treatment strategies.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

Stochastic Mechanistic Interaction

We propose a fully probabilistic formulation of the notion of mechanistic interaction (interaction in some fundamental mechanistic sense) between the effects of putative (possibly continuous) causal factors A and B on a binary outcome variable Y indicating 'survival' vs 'failure'. We define mechanistic interaction in terms of departure from a generalized 'noisy OR' model, under which the multiplicative causal effect of A (resp., B) on the probability of failure cannot be enhanced by manipulating B (resp., A). We present conditions under which mechanistic interaction in the above sense can be assessed via simple tests on excess risk or superadditivity, in a possibly retrospective regime of observation. These conditions are defined in terms of generalized conditional independence relationships (generalised because they may involve non-stochastic 'regime indicators') that can often be checked on a graphical representation of the problem. Inference about mechanistic interaction between direct, or path-specific, causal effects can be accommodated in the proposed framework. The method is illustrated with the aid of a study in experimental psychology.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

A Formal Treatment of Sequential Ignorability

Taking a rigorous formal approach, we consider sequential decision problems involving observable variables, unobservable variables, and action variables. We can typically assume the property of extended stability, which allows identification (by means of G-computation) of the consequence of a specified treatment strategy if the unobserved variables are, in fact, observed - but not generally otherwise. However, under certain additional special conditions we can infer simple stability (or sequential ignorability), which supports G-computation based on the observed variables alone. One such additional condition is sequential randomization, where the unobserved variables essentially behave as random noise in their effects on the actions. Another is sequential irrelevance, where the unobserved variables do not influence future observed variables. In the latter case, to deduce sequential ignorability in full generality requires additional positivity conditions. We show here that these positivity conditions are not required when all variables are discrete.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access