BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

A. Panaitescu

A. Panaitescu contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
astro-phastro-ph.HE

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 21 - EmergingVerification L1Unclaimed author
29works
0followers
2topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

29 published item(s)

preprint2020arXiv

X-ray Afterglows from the Gamma-Ray Burst "Large(r)-Angle" Emission

We derive basic analytical results for the timing and decay of the GRB-counterpart and delayed-afterglow light-curves for a brief emission episode from a relativistic surface endowed with angular structure, consisting of a uniform Core of size theta_c (Lorentz factor Gamma_c and surface emissivity i_nu are angle-independent) and an axially-symmetric power-law Envelope (Gamma ~ theta^{-g}). In this Large-Angle Emission (LAE) model, radiation produced during the prompt emission phase (GRB) at angles theta > theta_c arrives at observer well after the burst (delayed emission). The dynamical time-range of the very fast-decaying GRB "tail" and of the flat afterglow "plateau", and the morphology of GRB counterpart/afterglow, are all determined by two parameters: the Core's parameter Gamma_c*theta_c and the Envelope's Lorentz factor index g, leading to three types of light-curves that display three post-GRB phases (type 1: tail, plateau/slow-decay, post-plateau/normal-decay), two post-GRB phases (type 2: tail and fast-decay), or just one (type 3: normal decay). We show how X-ray light-curve features can be used to determine Core and Envelope dynamical and spectral parameters. Testing of the LAE model is done using the Swift/XRT X-ray emission of two afterglows of type 1 (060607A, 061121), one of type 2 (061110A), and one of type 3 (061007). We find that the X-ray afterglows with plateaus require an Envelope Lorentz factor Gamma ~ theta^{-2} and a comoving-frame emissivity i_nu ~ theta^2, thus, for a typical afterglow spectrum F_nu ~ nu^{-1}, the lab-frame energy release is uniform over the emitting surface.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2019arXiv

Adiabatic and Radiative Cooling of Relativistic Electrons Applied to Synchrotron Spectra and Light-Curves of Gamma-Ray Burst Pulses

We investigate the adiabatic and radiative (synchrotron and inverse-Compton) cooling of relativistic electrons whose injected/initial distribution with energy is a power-law above a typical energy $γ_i$. Analytical and numerical results are presented for the cooling-tail and the cooled-injected distribution that develop below and above the typical energy of injected electrons, for the evolution of the peak-energy $E_p$ of the synchrotron emission spectrum, and for the pulse shape resulting from an episode of electron injection. The synchrotron emission calculated numerically is compared with the spectrum and shape of Gamma-Ray Burst (GRB) pulses. Both adiabatic and radiative cooling processes lead to a softening of the pulse spectrum, and both types of cooling processes lead to pulses peaking earlier and lasting shorter at higher energy, quantitatively consistent with observations. For adiabatic-dominated electron cooling, a power-law injection rate $R_i$ suffices to explain the observed power-law GRB low-energy spectra. Synchrotron-dominated cooling leads to power-law cooling-tails that yield the synchrotron standard slope alpha = -3/2 provided that $R_i \sim B^2$, which is exactly the expectation if the magnetic field is a constant fraction of the post-shock energy density. Increasing (decreasing) $R_i$ and decreasing (increasing) B(t) lead to slopes alpha harder (softer, respectively) than the standard value and to non--power-law (curved) cooling-tails. Inverse-Compton cooling yields four values for the slope alpha but, as for synchrotron, other $R_i$ or B histories yield a wider range of slopes and curved low-energy spectra. Feedback between the power-law segments that develop below and above the typical injected electron leads to a synchrotron spectrum with many breaks above and below the usual 10 keV-1 MeV observing range.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Optical Flashes from Internal Pairs Formed in Gamma-Ray Burst Afterglows

We develop a numerical formalism for calculating the distribution with energy of the (internal) pairs formed in a relativistic source from unscattered MeV--TeV photons. For GRB afterglows, this formalism is more suitable if the relativistic reverse-shock that energizes the ejecta is the source of the GeV photons. The number of pairs formed is set by the source GeV output (calculated from the Fermi-LAT fluence), the unknown source Lorentz factor, and the unmeasured peak energy of the LAT spectral component. We show synchrotron and inverse-Compton light-curves expected from pairs formed in the shocked medium and identify some criteria for testing a pair origin of GRB optical counterparts. Pairs formed in bright LAT afterglows with a Lorentz factor in the few hundreds may produce bright optical counterparts (R < 10) lasting for up to one hundred seconds. The number of internal pairs formed from unscattered seed photons decreases very strongly with the source Lorentz factor, thus bright GRB optical counterparts cannot arise from internal pairs if the afterglow Lorentz factor is above several hundreds.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

&#34;Self-absorbed&#34; GeV light-curves of Gamma-Ray Burst afterglows

We investigate the effect that the absorption of high-energy (above 100 MeV) photons produced in GRB afterglow shocks has on the light-curves and spectra of Fermi-LAT afterglows. Afterglows produced by the interaction of a relativistic outflow with a wind-like medium peak when the blast-wave deceleration sets in, and the afterglow spectrum could be hardening before that peak, as the optical thickness to pair-formation is decreasing. In contrast, in afterglows produced in the interaction with a homogeneous medium, the optical thickness to pair-formation should increase and yield a light-curve peak when it reaches unity, followed by a fast light-curve decay, accompanied by a spectral softening. If energy is injected in the blast-wave, then the accelerated increase of the optical thickness yields a convex afterglow light-curve. Other features, such as a double-peak light-curve or a broad hump, can arise from the evolution of the optical thickness to photon-photon absorption. Fast decays and convex light-curves are seen in a few LAT afterglows, but the expected spectral softening is rarely seen in (and difficult to measure with) LAT observations. Furthermore, for the effects of photon-photon attenuation to shape the high-energy afterglow light-curve without attenuating it too much, the ejecta initial Lorentz factor must be in a relatively narrow range (50-200), which reduces the chance of observing those effects.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

Synchrotron and inverse-Compton emissions from pairs formed in GRB afterglows (analytical treatment)

We calculate the synchrotron and inverse-Compton emissions from pairs formed in GRB afterglows from high-energy photons (above 100 MeV), assuming a power-law photon spectrum C_nu ~ nu^{-2} and considering only the pairs generated from primary high-energy photons. The essential properties of these pairs (number, minimal energy, cooling energy, distribution with energy) and of their emission (peak flux, spectral breaks, spectral slope) are set by the observables GeV fluence Phi (t) = Ft and spectrum, and by the Lorentz factor Gamma and magnetic field B of the source of high-energy photons, at observer-time t. Optical and X-ray pseudo--light-curves F_nu (Gamma) are calculated for given B; proper synchrotron self-Compton light-curves are calculated by setting the dynamics Gamma(t) of the high-energy photons source to be that of a decelerating, relativistic shock. It is found that the emission from pairs can accommodate the flux and decays of the optical flashes measured during the prompt (GRB) phase and of the faster-decaying X-ray plateaus observed during the delayed (afterglow) phase. The brightest pair optical emission is obtained for 100 < Gamma < 500, and depends mostly on the GeV fluence, being independent of the source redshift. Emission from pairs formed during the GRB phase offers an alternate explanation to reverse-shock optical flashes. These two models may be distinguished based on their corresponding flux decay index--spectral slope relations, different correlations with the LAT fluence, or through modeling of the afterglow multiwavelength data.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

An external-shock model for GRB afterglow 130427A

The complex multiwavelength emission of GRB afterglow 130427A (monitored in the radio up to 10 days, in the optical and X-ray until 50 days, and at GeV energies until 1 day) can be accounted for by a hybrid reverse-forward shock synchrotron model, with inverse-Compton emerging only above a few GeV. The high ratio of the early optical to late radio flux requires that the ambient medium is a wind and that the forward-shock synchrotron spectrum peaks in the optical at about 10 ks. The latter has two consequences: the wind must be very tenuous and the optical emission before 10 ks must arise from the reverse-shock, as suggested also by the bright optical flash that Raptor has monitored during the prompt emission phase (<100 s). The VLA radio emission is from the reverse-shock, the Swift X-ray emission is mostly from the forward-shock, but the both shocks give comparable contributions to the Fermi GeV emission. The weak wind implies a large blast-wave radius (8 t_{day}^{1/2} pc), which requires a very tenuous circumstellar medium, suggesting that the massive stellar progenitor of GRB 130427A resided in a super-bubble.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

Peaks of optical and X-ray afterglow light-curves

The peaks of 30 optical afterglows and 14 X-ray light-curves display a good anticorrelation of the peak flux with the peak epoch: F_p ~ t_p^{-2.0} in the optical, F_p ~ t_p^{-1.6} in the X-ray, the distributions of the peak epochs being consistent with each other. We investigate the ability of two forward-shock models for afterglow light-curve peaks -- an observer location outside the initial jet aperture and the onset of the forward-shock deceleration -- to account for those peak correlations. For both models, the slope of the F_p - t_p relation depends only on the slope of the afterglow spectrum. We find that only a conical jet seen off-aperture and interacting with a wind-like medium can account for both the X-ray peak relation, given the average X-ray spectral slope beta_x = 1.0, and for the larger slope of the optical peak relation. However, any conclusion about the origin of the peak flux - peak epoch correlation is, at best, tentative, because the current sample of X-ray peaks is too small to allow a reliable measurement of the F_p - t_p relation slope and because more than one mechanism and/or one afterglow parameter may be driving that correlation.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

The Bright Optical flash and Afterglow from the Gamma-Ray Burst GRB 130427A

The optical light that is generated simultaneously with the x-rays and gamma-rays during a gamma-ray burst (GRB) provides clues about the nature of the explosions that occur as massive stars collapse to form black holes. We report on the bright optical flash and fading afterglow from the powerful burst GRB 130427A and present a comparison with the properties of the gamma-ray emission that show correlation of the optical and >100 MeV photon flux light curves during the first 7,000 seconds. We attribute this correlation to co-generation in an external shock. The simultaneous, multi-color, optical observations are best explained at early times by reverse shock emission generated in the relativistic burst ejecta as it collides with surrounding material and at late times by a forward shock traversing the circumburst environment. The link between optical afterglow and >100 MeV emission suggests that nearby early peaked afterglows will be the best candidates for studying GRB emission at GeV/TeV energies.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2012arXiv

Broadband study of GRB 091127: a sub-energetic burst at higher redshift?

GRB 091127 is a bright gamma-ray burst (GRB) detected by Swift at a redshift z=0.49 and associated with SN 2009nz. We present the broadband analysis of the GRB prompt and afterglow emission and study its high-energy properties in the context of the GRB/SN association. While the high luminosity of the prompt emission and standard afterglow behavior are typical of cosmological long GRBs, its low energy release, soft spectrum and unusual spectral lag connect this GRB to the class of sub-energetic bursts. We discuss the suppression of high-energy emission in this burst, and investigate whether this behavior could be connected with the sub-energetic nature of the explosion.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2012arXiv

GRB 091029: At the limit of the fireball scenario

Using high-quality, broad-band afterglow data for GRB 091029, we test the validity of the forward-shock model for gamma-ray burst afterglows. We used multi-wavelength (NIR to X-ray) follow-up observations obtained with the GROND, BOOTES-3/YA and Stardome optical ground-based telescopes, and the UVOT and the XRT onboard the Swift satellite. To explain the almost totally decoupled light curves in the X-ray and optical/NIR domains, a two-component outflow is proposed. Several models are tested, including continuous energy injection, components with different electron energy indices and components in two different stages of spectral evolution. Only the last model can explain both the decoupled light curves with asynchronous peaks and the peculiar SED evolution. However, this model has so many unknown free parameters that we are unable to reliably confirm or disprove its validity, making the afterglow of GRB 091029 difficult to explain in the framework of the simplest fireball model.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2011arXiv

GRB 090510: a short burst from a massive star ?

GRB afterglow 090510 is (so far) the best-monitored afterglow in the optical, X-ray, and above 100 MeV, measurements covering 2-3 decades in time at each frequency. Owing to its power-law temporal decay and power-law spectrum, it seems very likely that the highest energy emission is from the forward-shock energizing the ambient medium (the standard blast-wave model for GRB afterglows), the GeV flux and its decay rate being consistent with that model&#39;s expectations. However, the synchrotron emission from a collimated outflow (the standard jet model) has difficulties in accounting for the lower-energy afterglow emission, where a simultaneous break occurs at 2 ks in the optical and X-ray light-curves, but with the optical flux decay (before and after the break) being much slower than in the X-rays (at same time). The measured X-ray and GeV fluxes are incompatible with the higher-energy afterglow emission being from same spectral component as the lower-energy afterglow emission, which suggests a synchrotron self-Compton model for this afterglow. Cessation of energy injection in the blast-wave and an ambient medium with a wind-like n ~ r^{-2} density can explain all features of the optical and X-ray light-curves of GRB afterglow 090510. Such an ambient medium radial structure is incompatible with this short-GRB originating from the merger of two compact stars.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2011arXiv

Optical afterglows of Gamma-Ray Bursts: peaks, plateaus, and possibilities

The optical light-curves of GRB afterglows display either peaks or plateaus. We identify 16 afterglows of the former type, 17 of the latter, and 4 with broad peaks, that could be of either type. The optical energy release of these two classes is similar and is correlated with the GRB output, the correlation being stronger for peaky afterglows, which suggests that the burst and afterglow emissions of peaky afterglows are from the same relativistic ejecta and that the optical emission of afterglows with plateaus arises more often from ejecta that did not produce the burst emission. Consequently, we propose that peaky optical afterglows are from impulsive ejecta releases and that plateau optical afterglows originate from long-lived engines, the break in the optical light-curve (peak or plateau end) marking the onset of the entire outflow deceleration. In the peak luminosity--peak time plane, the distribution of peaky afterglows displays an edge with L_p \propto t_p^{-3}, which we attribute to variations (among afterglows) in the ambient medium density. The fluxes and epochs of optical plateau breaks follow a L_b \propto t_b^{-1} anticorrelation. Sixty percent of 25 afterglows that were well-monitored in the optical and X-rays show light-curves with comparable power-law decays indices and achromatic breaks. The other 40 percent display three types of decoupled behaviours: i) chromatic optical light-curve breaks (perhaps due to the peak of the synchrotron spectrum crossing the optical), ii) X-ray flux decays faster than in the optical (suggesting that the X-ray emission is from local inverse-Compton scattering), and iii) chromatic X-ray light-curve breaks (indicating that the X-ray emission is from external up-scattering).

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2011arXiv

The Swift/Fermi GRB 080928 from 1 eV to 150 keV

We present the results of a comprehensive study of the gamma-ray burst 080928 and of its afterglow. GRB 080928 was a long burst detected by Swift/BAT and Fermi/GBM. It is one of the exceptional cases where optical emission had already been detected when the GRB itself was still radiating in the gamma-ray band. For nearly 100 seconds simultaneous optical, X-ray and gamma-ray data provide a coverage of the spectral energy distribution of the transient source from about 1 eV to 150 keV. In particular, we show that the SED during the main prompt emission phase agrees with synchrotron radiation. We constructed the optical/near-infrared light curve and the spectral energy distribution based on Swift/UVOT, ROTSE-IIIa (Australia), and GROND (La Silla) data and compared it to the X-ray light curve retrieved from the Swift/XRT repository. We show that its bumpy shape can be modeled by multiple energy-injections into the forward shock.Furthermore, we investigate whether the temporal and spectral evolution of the tail emission of the first strong flare seen in the early X-ray light curve can be explained by large-angle emission (LAE). We find that a nonstandard LAE model is required to explain the observations. Finally, we report on the results of our search for the GRB host galaxy, for which only a deep upper limit can be provided.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2008arXiv

An external-shock origin of the E_p-E_gamma relation for Gamma-Ray Bursts

We investigate the possibility that the E_p propto E_gamma^{1/2} relation between the peak energy E_p of the nuF_nu spectrum and energy output E_gamma for long-duration GRBs arises from the external shock produced by the interaction of a relativistic outflow with the ambient medium. To that aim, we take into account the dependence of all parameters which determine E_p and E_gamma on the radial distribution of the ambient medium density and find that the E_p-E_gamma relation can be explained if the medium around GRBs has a universal radial stratification. For various combinations of GRB radiative process (synchrotron or inverse-Compton) and dissipation mechanism (reverse or forward shock), we find that the circumburst medium must have a particle density with a radial distribution different than the R^{-2} expected for constant mass-loss rate and terminal speed.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2008arXiv

What did we learn from gamma-ray burst 080319B ?

The optical and gamma-ray observations of GRB 080319B allow us to determine a fairly complete physical picture for this remarkable burst. The data indicate that the prompt optical and gamma-ray photons were produced at the same location but by different radiation processes: synchrotron and synchrotron self-Compton, respectively. The burst emission was produced at a distance of 10^{16.5} cm from the center of explosion by an ultra-relativistic source moving at Lorentz factor of ~500. A straightforward inference is that about 10 times more energy must have been radiated at tens of GeV than that released at ~1 MeV. Assuming that the GRB outflow was baryonic and that the gamma-ray source was shock-heated plasma, the collimation-corrected kinetic energy of the jet powering GRB 080319B was larger than 10^{52.3} erg. The decay of the early afterglow optical emission (up to 1 ks) is too fast to be attributed to the reverse shock crossing the GRB ejecta but is consistent with the expectations for the &#34;large-angle emission&#34; released during the burst. The pure power-law decay of the optical afterglow flux from 1 ks to 10 day is most naturally identified with the (synchrotron) emission from the shock propagating into a wind-like medium. However, the X-ray afterglow requires a departure from the standard blast-wave model.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2007arXiv

Constraints on Type Ib/c and GRB Progenitors

Although there is strong support for the collapsar engine as the power source of long-duration gamma-ray bursts (GRBs), we still do not definitively know the progenitor of these explosions. Here we review the current set of progenitor scenarios for long-duration GRBs and the observational constraints on these scenarios. Examining these, we find that single-star models cannot be the only progenitor for long-duration GRBs. Several binary progenitors can match the solid observational constraints and also have the potential to match the trends we are currently seeing in the observations. Type Ib/c supernovae are also likely to be produced primarily in binaries; we discuss the relationship between the progenitors of these explosions and those of the long-duration GRBs.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2007arXiv

The nature of the outflow in gamma-ray bursts

The Swift satellite has enabled us to follow the evolution of gamma-ray burst (GRB) fireballs from the prompt gamma-ray emission to the afterglow phase. The early x-ray and optical data obtained by telescopes aboard the Swift satellite show that the source for prompt gamma-ray emission, the emission that heralds these bursts, is short lived and that its source is distinct from that of the ensuing, long-lived afterglow. Using these data, we determine the distance of the gamma-ray source from the center of the explosion. We find this distance to be 1e15-1e16 cm for most bursts and we show that this is within a factor of ten of the radius of the shock-heated circumstellar medium (CSM) producing the x-ray photons. Furthermore, using the early gamma-ray, x-ray and optical data, we show that the prompt gamma-ray emission cannot be produced in internal shocks, nor can it be produced in the external shock; in a more general sense gamma-ray generation mechanisms based on shock physics have problems explaining the GRB data for the ten Swift bursts analyzed in this work. A magnetic field dominated outflow model for GRBs has some attractive features, although the evidence in its favor is inconclusive. Finally, the x-ray and optical data allow us to provide an upper limit on the density of the CSM of about 10 protons per cubic cm at a distance of about 5e16 cm from the center of explosion.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2006arXiv

Evidence for chromatic X-ray light-curve breaks in Swift GRB afterglows and their theoretical implications

The power-law decay of the X-ray emission of GRB afterglows 050319, 050401, 050607, 050713A, 050802 and 050922C exhibits a steepening at about 1--4 hours after the burst which, surprisingly, is not accompanied by a break in the optical emission. If it is assumed that both the optical and X-ray afterglows arise from the same outflow then, in the framework of the standard forward shock model, the chromaticity of the X-ray light-curve breaks indicates that they do not arise solely from a mechanism related to the outflow dynamics (e.g. energy injection) or the angular distribution of the blast-wave kinetic energy (structured outflows or jets). The lack of a spectral evolution accompanying the X-ray light-curve breaks shows that these breaks do not arise from the passage of a spectral break (e.g. the cooling frequency) either. Under these circumstances, the decoupling of the X-ray and optical decays requires that the microphysical parameters for the electron and magnetic energies in the forward shock evolve in time, whether the X-ray afterglow is synchrotron or inverse-Compton emission. For a steady evolution of these parameters with the Lorentz factor of the forward shock and an X-ray light-curve break arising from cessation of energy injection into the blast-wave, the optical and X-ray properties of the above six Swift afterglows require a circumburst medium with a r^{-2} radial stratification, as expected for a massive star origin for long GRBs. Alternatively, the chromatic X-ray light-curve breaks may indicate that the optical and X-ray emissions arise from different outflows. Neither feature (evolution of microphysical parameters or the different origin of the optical and X-ray emissions) were clearly required by pre-Swift afterglows.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2006arXiv

Phases of Swift X-ray Afterglows

The X-ray afterglows observed by Swift exhibit rich light-curves, with four phases of different decay rate. The temporal and spectral properties for a set of 47 bursts are used to identify the mechanisms which can explain these four phases. The early, fast-decaying phase can be attributed to the same mechanism which generated the burst emission (internal shocks in a relativistic outflow), while the following phases of slower decay can be identified with synchrotron emission from the forward shock sweeping the circumburst medium. Most likely, the phase of slowest decay is due to a continuous energy injection in the forward shock. That the optical power-law decay continues unabated after the end of energy injection requires an ambient medium with a wind-like density structure (n propto r^{-2}) and forward shock microphysical parameters that change with the shock&#39;s Lorentz factor. A later break of the X-ray light-curve can be attributed to a collimated outflow whose boundary becomes visible to the observer (a jet) but the optical and X-ray decays are not always consistent with the standard jet model expectations.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2006arXiv

Swift observations of GRB050904: the most distant cosmic explosion ever observed

Swift discovered the high redshift (z=6.29) GRB050904 with the Burst Alert Telescope (BAT) and began observing with its narrow field instruments 161 s after the burst onset. This gamma-ray burst is the most distant cosmic explosion ever observed. Because of its high redshift, the X-ray Telescope (XRT) and BAT simultaneous observations provide 4 orders of magnitude of spectral coverage (0.2-150 keV; 1.4-1090 keV in the source rest frame) at a very early source-frame time (22 s). GRB050904 was a long, multi-peaked, bright GRB with strong variability during its entire evolution. The light curve observed by the XRT is characterized by the presence of a long flaring activity lasting up to 1-2 hours after the burst onset in the burst rest frame, with no evidence of a smooth power-law decay following the prompt emission as seen in other GRBs. However, the BAT tail extrapolated to the XRT band joins the XRT early light curve and the overall behavior resembles that of a very long GRB prompt. The spectral energy distribution softens with time, with the photon index decreasing from -1.2 during the BAT observation to -1.9 at the end of the XRT observation. The dips of the late X-ray flares may be consistent with an underlying X-ray emission arising from the forward shock and with the properties of the optical afterglow reported by Tagliaferri et al. (2005b). We interpret the BAT and XRT data as a single continuous observation of the prompt emission from a very long GRB. The peculiarities observed in GRB050904 could be due to its origin within one of the first star-forming regions in the Universe; very low metallicities of the progenitor at these epochs may provide an explanation.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2005arXiv

Analysis of the X-ray Emission of Nine Swift Afterglows

The X-ray light-curves of 9 Swift XRT afterglows (050126, 050128, 050219A, 050315, 050318, 050319, 050401, 050408, 050505) display a complex behaviour: a steep t^{-3.0 \pm 0.3} decay until ~400 s, followed by a significantly slower t^{-0.65+/-0.20} fall-off, which at 0.2--2 d after the burst evolves into a t^{-1.7+/-0.5} decay. We consider three possible models for the geometry of relativistic blast-waves (spherical outflows, non-spreading jets, and spreading jets), two possible dynamical regimes for the forward shock (adiabatic and fully radiative), and we take into account a possible angular structure of the outflow and delayed energy injection in the blast-wave, to identify the models which reconcile the X-ray light-curve decay with the slope of the X-ray continuum for each of the above three afterglow phases. By piecing together the various models for each phase in a way that makes physical sense, we identify possible models for the entire X-ray afterglow. The major conclusion of this work is that a long-lived episode of energy injection in the blast-wave, during which the shock energy increases at t^{1.0+/-0.5}, is required for five afterglows and could be at work in the other four as well. Optical observations in conjunction with the X-ray can distinguish among these various models. Our simple tests allow the determination of the location of the cooling frequency relative to the X-ray domain and, thus, of the index of the electron power-law distribution with energy in the blast-wave. The resulting indices are clearly inconsistent with an universal value.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2005arXiv

Discovery of an Afterglow Extension of the Prompt Phase of Two Gamma Ray Bursts Observed by Swift

BAT and XRT observations of two recent well-covered GRBs observed by Swift, GRB 050315 and GRB 050319, show clearly a prompt component joining the onset of the afterglow emission. By fitting a power law form to the gamma-ray spectrum, we extrapolate the time dependent fluxes measured by the BAT, in the energy band 15-350 keV, into the spectral regime observed by the XRT 0.2-10 keV, and examine the functional form of the rate of decay of the two light curves. We find that the BAT and XRT light curves merge to form a unified curve. There is a period of steep decay up to ~300 s, followed by a flatter decay. The duration of the steep decay, ~100 s in the source frame after correcting for cosmological time dilation, agrees roughly with a theoretical estimate for the deceleration time of the relativistic ejecta as it interacts with circumstellar material. For GRB 050315, the steep decay can be characterized by an exponential form, where one e-folding decay time t_e(BAT) ~ 24+/-2 s, and t_e(XRT) ~ 35+/-2 s. For GRB 050319, a power law decay -(d ln f/d ln t) = n, where n is about 3, provides a reasonable fit. The early time X-ray fluxes are consistent with representing the lower energy tail of the prompt emission, and provide our first quantitative measure of the decay of the prompt gamma-ray emission over a large dynamic range in flux. The initial steep decay is expected due to the delayed high latitude photons from a curved shell of relativistic plasma illuminated only for a short interval. The overall conclusion is that the prompt phase of GRBs remains observable for hundreds of seconds longer than previously thought.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2005arXiv

Models for Achromatic Light-Curve Breaks in GRB Afterglows: Jets, Structured Outflows, and Energy Injection

The steepening (break) of the power-law fall-off observed in the optical emission of some GRB afterglows at epoch ~1 day is often attributed to a collimated outflow (jet), undergoing lateral spreading. Wider opening GRB ejecta with a non-uniform energy angular distribution (structured outflows) or the cessation of energy injection in the afterglow can also yield light-curve breaks. We determine the optical and X-ray light-curve decay indices and spectral energy distribution slopes for 10 GRB afterglows with optical light-curve breaks (980519, 990123, 990510, 991216, 000301, 000926, 010222, 011211, 020813, 030226), and use these properties to test the above models for light-curve steepening. It is found that the optical breaks of six of these afterglows can be accommodated by either energy injection or by structured outflows. In the refreshed shock model, a wind-like stratification of the circumburst medium (as expected for massive stars as GRB progenitors) is slightly favoured. A spreading jet interacting with a homogeneous circumburst medium is required by the afterglows 990510, 000301, 011211, and 030226. The optical pre- and post-break decays of these four afterglows are incompatible with a wind-like medium. The current sample of 10 afterglows with breaks suggests that the distribution of the break magnitude (defined as the increase of the afterglow decay exponent) is bimodal, with a gap at 1. If true, this bimodality favours the structured outflow model, while the gap location indicates a homogeneous circumburst environment.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2004arXiv

Analysis of Two Scenarios for the Early Optical Emission of the GRB Afterglows 990123 and 021211

The optical light-curves of GRB afterglows 990123 and 021211 exhibit a steep decay at 100--600 seconds after the burst, the decay becoming slower after about 10 minutes. We investigate two scenarios for the fast decaying early optical emission of these GRB afterglows. In the reverse-forward shock scenario, this emission arises in the reverse shock crossing the GRB ejecta, the mitigation of the light-curve decay occurring when the forward shock emission overtakes that from the reverse shock. Both a homogeneous and wind-like circumburst medium are considered. In the wind-bubble scenario, the steeply decaying, early optical emission arises from the forward shock interacting with a 1/r^2 bubble, with a negligible contribution from the reverse shock, the slower decay starting when the blast wave reaches the bubble termination shock and enters a homogeneous region of the circumburst medium. We determine the shock microphysical parameters, ejecta kinetic energy, and circumburst density which accommodate the radio and optical measurements of the GRB afterglows 990123 and 021211. We find that, for a homogeneous medium, the radio and optical emissions of the afterglow 990123 can be accommodated by the reverse-forward shock scenario if the microphysical parameters behind the two shocks differ substantially. A wind-like circumburst medium also allows the reverse-forward shocks scenario to account for the radio and optical properties of the afterglows 990123 and 021211, but the required wind densities are at least 10 times smaller than those of Galactic Wolf-Rayet stars. The wind-bubble scenario requires a variation of the microphysical parameters when the afterglow fireball reaches the wind termination shock, which seems a contrived feature.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2004arXiv

On the Shallow Decay of Some GRB Afterglows

Half of the radio afterglows for which there is a good temporal coverage exhibit after 10 days from the burst a decay which is shallower than at optical frequencies, contrary to what is expected within the simplest form of the standard model of relativistic fireballs or jets. We investigate possible ways to decouple the radio and optical decays. First, the radio and optical emissions are assumed to arise from the same electron population and we allow for either a time-varying slope of the power-law distribution of electron energy or for time-varying microphysical parameters. Then we consider two scenarios where the radio and optical emissions arise in distinct parts of the GRB outflow, either because the outflow has an angular structure or because there is a long-lived reverse shock. We find that the only the last scenario is compatible with the observations.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2004arXiv

Prompt Gamma-ray and Early Afterglow Emission in the External Shock Model

We describe our attempt to determine if gamma-ray burst (GRB) and afterglow emissions could both arise in external shocks for simple GRBs--bursts consisting of just a few peaks in their lightcurves. We calculate peak flux and peak frequency during the gamma-ray burst for ten well observed bursts using the same set of parameters that are determined from modeling afterglow emissions. We find the gamma-ray emission properties for 970508 (which had a single peak lightcurve) fit nicely with the extrapolation of its afterglow data, and therefore this burst was likely produced in the external shock. One can explain two other bursts in this sample as forward shock synchrotron emission provided that the magnetic field parameter during the burst is close to equipartition, and larger by a factor of 100 than the afterglow value at ~1 day. The remaining seven bursts cannot be explained in the external shock model even if we allow the energy fraction in electrons and magnetic field and the density of the surrounding medium to take on any physically permitted value; the peak of the spectrum is above the cooling frequency, therefore the peak flux is independent of the latter of these two parameters, and is too small by about an order of magnitude than the observed values. We have also considered inverse-Compton scattering in forward and reverse shock regions and find that it can explain the gamma-ray emission for a few bursts, but requires the density to be 1--2 orders of magnitude larger than a typical Wolf-Rayet star wind and much larger than permitted by late afterglow observations. [Abridged]

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2004arXiv

The Slow Decay of Some Radio Afterglows, a Puzzle for the Simplest GRB Fireball Model

Abridged: The decay of half of the GRB radio afterglows with long temporal monitoring is significantly slower than at optical frequencies, contrary to what is expected in the simplest fireball model. We investigate four ways to decouple the radio and optical decays: an evolving index of the power-law distribution of the shock-accelerated electrons, the presence of a spectral break between the two domains, a structured outflow, and a long-lived reverse shock contribution to the afterglow emission. [...] In the fourth scenario, it is assumed that the radio afterglow emission arises in the reverse shock propagating in a steady stream of ejecta, which catch up with the decelerating GRB remnant. This scenario can accommodate the properties of the afterglows with slow radio decays and requires that the injected energy is less than or comparable to the initial fireball energy, while other afterglow parameters have reasonable values. For a jet, the transition to a semi-relativistic motion mitigates the radio decay, however this scenario would work only when the slower radio decay is observed well after the steeper optical fall-off. A structured outflow with a relativistic core, yielding a fast decaying optical emission, and a non-relativistic envelope, producing a slowly falling-off radio afterglow, is not a viable solution, as it fails to decouple the radio and optical decays.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2000arXiv

Analytic Light-Curves of Gamma-Ray Burst Afterglows: Homogeneous versus Wind External Media

Assuming an adiabatic evolution of a Gamma-Ray Burst (GRB) remnant interacting with an external medium, we calculate the injection, cooling, and absorption break frequencies, and the afterglow flux for plausible orderings of the break and observing frequencies. The analytical calculations are restricted to a relativistic remnant and, in the case of collimated ejecta, to the phase where there is an insignificant lateral expansion. Results are given for both a homogeneous external medium and for a wind ejected by the GRB progenitor. We compare the afterglow emission at different observing frequencies, for each type of external medium. It is found that observations at sub-millimeter frequencies during the first day provide the best way of discriminating between the two models. By taking into account the effect of inverse Compton scatterings on the electron cooling, a new possible time-dependence of the cooling break is identified. The signature of the up-scattering losses could be seen in the optical synchrotron emission from a GRB remnant interacting with a pre-ejected wind, as a temporary mild flattening of the afterglow decay. The up-scattered radiation itself should be detected in the soft X-ray emission from GRB remnants running into denser external media, starting few hours after the main event.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint1999arXiv

Dynamical Evolution, Light-Curves and Spectra of Spherical and Collimated Gamma-Ray Burst Remnants

We present an analytical approach to the dynamical evolution of fireballs or axially symmetric jets expanding into an external medium, with application to Gamma-Ray Burst remnants. This method leads to numerical calculations of fireball dynamics that are computationally faster than hydrodynamic simulations. It is also a very flexible approach, that can be easily extended to include more complex situations, such as a continuous injection of energy at the reverse shock, and the sideways expansion in non-spherical ejecta. Some features of the numerical results for the remnant dynamical evolution are discussed and compared to the analytical results. We find that the ratio of the observer times when the jet half-angle reaches twice its initial value and when the light cone becomes wider than the jet is substantially smaller than predicted analytically. The effects arising from the remnant curvature and thickness further reduce this ratio, such that the afterglow light-curve break due to the remnant finite angular extent overlaps the weaker break due to the jet&#39;s sideways expansion. An analysis of the effects of the curvature and thickness of the remnant on the afterglow light-curves shows that these effects are important and should be taken into account for accurate calculations of the afterglow emission.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access