Paper detail

Adiabatic and Radiative Cooling of Relativistic Electrons Applied to Synchrotron Spectra and Light-Curves of Gamma-Ray Burst Pulses

We investigate the adiabatic and radiative (synchrotron and inverse-Compton) cooling of relativistic electrons whose injected/initial distribution with energy is a power-law above a typical energy $γ_i$. Analytical and numerical results are presented for the cooling-tail and the cooled-injected distribution that develop below and above the typical energy of injected electrons, for the evolution of the peak-energy $E_p$ of the synchrotron emission spectrum, and for the pulse shape resulting from an episode of electron injection. The synchrotron emission calculated numerically is compared with the spectrum and shape of Gamma-Ray Burst (GRB) pulses. Both adiabatic and radiative cooling processes lead to a softening of the pulse spectrum, and both types of cooling processes lead to pulses peaking earlier and lasting shorter at higher energy, quantitatively consistent with observations. For adiabatic-dominated electron cooling, a power-law injection rate $R_i$ suffices to explain the observed power-law GRB low-energy spectra. Synchrotron-dominated cooling leads to power-law cooling-tails that yield the synchrotron standard slope alpha = -3/2 provided that $R_i \sim B^2$, which is exactly the expectation if the magnetic field is a constant fraction of the post-shock energy density. Increasing (decreasing) $R_i$ and decreasing (increasing) B(t) lead to slopes alpha harder (softer, respectively) than the standard value and to non--power-law (curved) cooling-tails. Inverse-Compton cooling yields four values for the slope alpha but, as for synchrotron, other $R_i$ or B histories yield a wider range of slopes and curved low-energy spectra. Feedback between the power-law segments that develop below and above the typical injected electron leads to a synchrotron spectrum with many breaks above and below the usual 10 keV-1 MeV observing range.

preprint2019arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.