Paper detail

On the Shallow Decay of Some GRB Afterglows

Half of the radio afterglows for which there is a good temporal coverage exhibit after 10 days from the burst a decay which is shallower than at optical frequencies, contrary to what is expected within the simplest form of the standard model of relativistic fireballs or jets. We investigate possible ways to decouple the radio and optical decays. First, the radio and optical emissions are assumed to arise from the same electron population and we allow for either a time-varying slope of the power-law distribution of electron energy or for time-varying microphysical parameters. Then we consider two scenarios where the radio and optical emissions arise in distinct parts of the GRB outflow, either because the outflow has an angular structure or because there is a long-lived reverse shock. We find that the only the last scenario is compatible with the observations.

preprint2004arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.