Paper detail

Zeroth law of thermodynamics for nonequilibrium steady states in contact

We ask what happens when two systems having a nonequilibrium steady state are kept in contact and allowed to exchange a quantity, say mass, which is conserved in the combined system. Will the systems eventually evolve to a new stationary state where certain intensive thermodynamic variable, like equilibrium chemical potential, equalizes following zeroth law of thermodynamics and, if so, under what conditions is it possible? We argue that the zeroth law would hold, provided both systems have short-ranged spatial correlations and they {\it interact weakly} to exchange mass with rates satisfying a balance condition - reminiscent of detailed balance in equilibrium. This proposition is proved for driven systems in general in the limit of small exchange rates (i.e., weak interaction) and is demonstrated} in various conserved-mass transport processes having nonzero spatial correlations.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.