Paper detail

Yukawa coupling unification in SO(10) with positive μ and a heavier gluino

The t-b-tau unification with positive Higgs mass parameter μ in the minimal supersymmetric standard model prefers "just so" Higgs splitting and a light gluino < 500 GeV which appears to be ruled out by the recent LHC searches. We reanalyze constraints on soft supersymmetry breaking parameters in this scenario allowing independent splittings among squarks and Higgs doublets at the grand unification scale and show that it is possible to obtain t-b-tau unification and satisfy experimental constraints on gluino mass without raising supersymmetry breaking scale to very high value ~ 20 TeV. We discuss the origin of independent squark and Higgs splittings in realistic SO(10) models. Just so Higgs splitting can be induced without significantly affecting the t-b-tau unification in SO(10) models containing Higgs fields transforming as 10+\bar{126}+126+210. This splitting arises in the presence of non-universal boundary conditions from mixing between 10 and other Higgs fields. Similarly, if additional matter fields are introduced then their mixing with the matter multiplet 16 is shown to generate the squark splitting required to raise the gluino mass within the t-b-tau unified models with positive μ.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.