Paper detail

Yet another surprise in the problem of classical diamagnetism

The well known Bohr-van Leeuwen Theorem states that the orbital diamagnetism of classical charged particles is identically zero in equilibrium. However, results based on real space-time approach using the classical Langevin equation predicts non-zero diamagnetism for classical unbounded (finite or infinite) systems. Here we show that the recently discovered Fluctuation Theorems, namely, the Jarzynski Equality or the Crooks Fluctuation Theorem surprisingly predict a free energy that depends on magnetic field as well as on the friction coefficient, in outright contradiction to the canonical equilibrium results. However, in the cases where the Langevin approach is consistent with the equilibrium results, the Fluctuation Theorems lead to results in conformity with equilibrium statistical mechanics. The latter is demonstrated analytically through a simple example that has been discussed recently.

preprint2009arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.