Paper detail

$X_{max}^μ$ vs. $N^μ$ from Extensive Air Showers as estimator for the mass of primary UHECR's. Application for the Pierre Auger Observatory

We study the possibility of primary mass estimation for Ultra High Energy Cosmic Rays (UHECR's) using the $X_{max}^μ$ (the height where the number of muons produced on the core of Extensive Air Showers (EAS) is maximum) and the number $N^μ$ of muons detected on ground. We use the 2D distribution - $X_{max}^μ$ against $N^μ$ in order to find its sensitivity to the mass of the primary particle. For that, we construct a 2D Probability Function $Prob(p,Fe \ | \ X_{max}^μ,N^μ)$ which estimates the probability that a certain point from the plane $(X_{max}^μ$, $N^μ)$ corresponds to a shower induced by a proton, respectively an iron nucleus. To test the procedure, we analyze a set of simulated EAS induced by protons and iron nuclei at energies of $10^{19} eV$ and $20^{\circ}$ zenith angle with CORSIKA. Using the Bayesian approach and taking into account the geometry of the infill detectors from the Pierre Auger Observatory, we observe an improvement in the accuracy of the primary mass reconstruction in comparison with the results obtained using only the $X_{max}^μ$ distributions.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.