Paper detail

X(1835), X(2120), X(2370) and $η(1760)$ in chiral quark model

By analyzing the meson spectra obtained in the constituent quark model, we find that the pseudoscalar mesons $η'(2^1S_0)$, $η(4^1S_0)$, $η'(3^1S_0)$ and $η'(4^1S_0)$ are the possible candidates of $η(1760)$, X(1835), X(2120) and X(2370). The strong decay widths of these pseudoscalars to all the possible decay modes are calculated within the framework of the $^3P_0$ model. Although the total width of $η'(2^1S_0)$ is compatible with the experimental value of BES for $η(1760)$, the partial decay width to $ωω$ is too small, which is not consistent with the result of BES. If the state X(1835) is interpreted as $η(4^1S_0)$, the total decay width is compatible with the experimental data, and the main decay modes will be $πa_0(980)$ and $πa_0(1450)$, which needs to be checked. The assignment of X(2120) and X(2370) to $η'(3^1S_0)$ and $η'(4^1S_0)$ is also disfavored in the present calculation because of the incompatibility of the decay widths.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.