Paper detail

Work statistics in the periodically driven quartic oscillator: classical versus quantum dynamics

In the thermodynamics of nanoscopic systems the relation between classical and quantum mechanical description is of particular importance. To scrutinize this correspondence we study an anharmonic oscillator driven by a periodic external force with slowly varying amplitude both classically and within the framework of quantum mechanics. The energy change of the oscillator induced by the driving is closely related to the probability distribution of work for the system. With the amplitude $λ(t)$ of the drive increasing from zero to a maximum $λ_{max}$ and then going back to zero again initial and final Hamiltonian coincide. The main quantity of interest is then the probability density $P(E_f|E_i)$ for transitions from initial energy $E_i$ to final energy $E_f$. In the classical case non-diagonal transitions with $E_f\neq E_i$ mainly arise due to the mechanism of separatrix crossing. We show that approximate analytical results within the pendulum approximation are in accordance with numerical simulations. In the quantum case numerically exact results are complemented with analytical arguments employing Floquet theory. For both classical and quantum case we provide an intuitive explanation for the periodic variation of $P(E_f|E_i)$ with the maximal amplitude $λ_{max}$ of the driving.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.