Paper detail

Winding angles of long lattice walks

We study the winding angles of random and self-avoiding walks on square and cubic lattices with number of steps $N$ ranging up to $10^7$. We show that the mean square winding angle $\langleθ^2\rangle$ of random walks converges to the theoretical form when $N\rightarrow\infty$. For self-avoiding walks on the square lattice, we show that the ratio $\langleθ^4\rangle/\langleθ^2\rangle^2$ converges slowly to the Gaussian value 3. For self avoiding walks on the cubic lattice we find that the ratio $\langleθ^4\rangle/\langleθ^2\rangle^2$ exhibits non-monotonic dependence on $N$ and reaches a maximum of 3.73(1) for $N\approx10^4$. We show that to a good approximation, the square winding angle of a self-avoiding walk on the cubic lattice can be obtained from the summation of the square change in the winding angles of $\ln N$ independent segments of the walk, where the $i$-th segment contains $2^i$ steps. We find that the square winding angle of the $i$-th segment increases approximately as $i^{0.5}$, which leads to an increase of the total square winding angle proportional to $(\ln N)^{1.5}$.

preprint2016arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.