Paper detail

Why polymer chains in a melt are not random walks

A cornerstone of modern polymer physics is the `Flory ideality hypothesis' which states that a chain in a polymer melt adopts `ideal' random-walk-like conformations. Here we revisit theoretically and numerically this pivotal assumption and demonstrate that there are noticeable deviations from ideality. The deviations come from the interplay of chain connectivity and the incompressibility of the melt, leading to an effective repulsion between chain segments of all sizes $s$. The amplitude of this repulsion increases with decreasing $s$ where chain segments become more and more swollen. We illustrate this swelling by an analysis of the form factor $F(q)$, i.e. the scattered intensity at wavevector $q$ resulting from intramolecular interferences of a chain. A `Kratky plot' of $q^2F(q)$ {\em vs.} $q$ does not exhibit the plateau for intermediate wavevectors characteristic of ideal chains. One rather finds a conspicuous depression of the plateau, $δ(F^{-1}(q)) = |q|^3/32ρ$, which increases with $q$ and only depends on the monomer density $ρ$.

preprint2007arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.