Paper detail

Why Do Elastin-Like Polypeptides Possibly Have Different Solvation Behaviors in Water-Ethanol and Water-Urea Mixtures?

The solvent quality determines the collapsed or the expanded state of a polymer. For example, a polymer dissolved in a poor solvent collapses, whereas in a good solvent it opens up. While this standard understanding is generally valid, there are examples when a polymer collapses even in a mixture of two good solvents. This phenomenon, commonly known as co-non-solvency, is usually associated with smart polymers. Moreover, recent experiments have shown that the elastin-like polypeptides (ELPs) show co-non-solvency behavior in aqueous-ethanol mixtures. In this study, we investigate the phase behavior of ELPs in aqueous binary mixtures using molecular dynamics simulations of all-atom and complementary explicit solvent generic models. The model is parameterized by mapping the solvation free energy obtained from the all-atom simulations onto the generic interaction parameters. For this purpose, we derive segment based generic parameters for four different peptides, namely proline (P), valine (V), glycine (G) and alanine (A). Here we compare the conformational behavior of two ELP sequences, namely VPGGG and VPGVG, in aqueous-ethanol and -urea mixtures. Consistent with recent experiments, we find that ELPs show co-non-solvency in aqueous-ethanol mixtures. Ethanol molecules have preferential binding with all ELP residues and thus driving the coil-to-globule transition. On the contrary, ELP conformations show weak variation in aqueous-urea mixtures. Our simulations suggest that the glycine residues dictate the overall behavior of ELPs in aqueous-urea, where urea molecules have a rather weak preferential binding with glycine, i.e., less than kT. While the validation of the latter findings will require more detailed experimental investigation, the results presented here may provide a new twist to the present understanding of cosolvent interactions with peptides and proteins.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.