Paper detail

Who Ordered This?: Exploiting Implicit User Tag Order Preferences for Personalized Image Tagging

What makes a person pick certain tags over others when tagging an image? Does the order that a person presents tags for a given image follow an implicit bias that is personal? Can these biases be used to improve existing automated image tagging systems? We show that tag ordering, which has been largely overlooked by the image tagging community, is an important cue in understanding user tagging behavior and can be used to improve auto-tagging systems. Inspired by the assumption that people order their tags, we propose a new way of measuring tag preferences, and also propose a new personalized tagging objective function that explicitly considers a user's preferred tag orderings. We also provide a (partially) greedy algorithm that produces good solutions to our new objective and under certain conditions produces an optimal solution. We validate our method on a subset of Flickr images that spans 5000 users, over 5200 tags, and over 90,000 images. Our experiments show that exploiting personalized tag orders improves the average performance of state-of-art approaches both on per-image and per-user bases.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors4 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.