Paper detail

WhittleSearch: Interactive Image Search with Relative Attribute Feedback

We propose a novel mode of feedback for image search, where a user describes which properties of exemplar images should be adjusted in order to more closely match his/her mental model of the image sought. For example, perusing image results for a query "black shoes", the user might state, "Show me shoe images like these, but sportier." Offline, our approach first learns a set of ranking functions, each of which predicts the relative strength of a nameable attribute in an image (e.g., sportiness). At query time, the system presents the user with a set of exemplar images, and the user relates them to his/her target image with comparative statements. Using a series of such constraints in the multi-dimensional attribute space, our method iteratively updates its relevance function and re-ranks the database of images. To determine which exemplar images receive feedback from the user, we present two variants of the approach: one where the feedback is user-initiated and another where the feedback is actively system-initiated. In either case, our approach allows a user to efficiently "whittle away" irrelevant portions of the visual feature space, using semantic language to precisely communicate her preferences to the system. We demonstrate our technique for refining image search for people, products, and scenes, and we show that it outperforms traditional binary relevance feedback in terms of search speed and accuracy. In addition, the ordinal nature of relative attributes helps make our active approach efficient -- both computationally for the machine when selecting the reference images, and for the user by requiring less user interaction than conventional passive and active methods.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.