Paper detail

Whittaker modules and representations of finite $W$-algebras of queer Lie superalgebras

We study various categories of Whittaker modules over the queer Lie superalgebras $\mathfrak q(n)$. We formulate standard Whittaker modules and reduce the problem of composition factors of these standard Whittaker modules to that of Verma modules in the BGG categories $\mathcal O$ of $\mathfrak q(n)$. We also obtain an analogue of Losev-Shu-Xiao decomposition for the finite $W$-superalgebras $U(\mathfrak q(n), E)$ of $\mathfrak q(n)$ associated to an odd nilpotent element $E\in \mathfrak q(n)_{\bar{1}}$. As an application, we establish several equivalences of categories of Whittaker $\mathfrak q(n)$-modules and analogues of BGG category of $U(\mathfrak q(n), E)$-modules. In particular, we reduce the multiplicity problem of Verma modules over $U(\mathfrak q(n), E)$ to that of the Verma modules in the BGG categories $\mathcal O$ of $\mathfrak q(n)$.

preprint2025arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.