Paper detail

Which small reaction networks are multistationary?

Reaction networks taken with mass-action kinetics arise in many settings, from epidemiology to population biology to systems of chemical reactions. Bistable reaction networks are posited to underlie biochemical switches, which motivates the following question: which reaction networks have the capacity for multiple steady states? Mathematically, this asks: among certain parametrized families of polynomial systems, which admit multiple positive roots? No complete answer is known. This work analyzes the smallest networks, those with only a few chemical species or reactions. For these "smallest" networks, we completely answer the question of multistationarity and, in some cases, multistability too, thereby extending related work of Boros. Our results highlight the role played by the Newton polytope of a network (the convex hull of the reactant vectors). Also, our work is motivated by recent results that explain how a given network's capacity for multistationarity arises from that of certain related networks which are typically smaller. Hence, we are interested in classifying small multistationary networks, and our work forms a first step in this direction.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.