BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Anne Shiu

Anne Shiu contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
math.DSmath.AGmath.COMolecular NetworksNeurons and Cognition

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 19 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
5works
0followers
5topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

5 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Absolute concentration robustness in networks with low-dimensional stoichiometric subspace

A reaction system exhibits "absolute concentration robustness" (ACR) in some species if the positive steady-state value of that species does not depend on initial conditions. Mathematically, this means that the positive part of the variety of the steady-state ideal lies entirely in a hyperplane of the form $x_i=c$, for some $c>0$. Deciding whether a given reaction system -- or those arising from some reaction network -- exhibits ACR is difficult in general, but here we show that for many simple networks, assessing ACR is straightforward. Indeed, our criteria for ACR can be performed by simply inspecting a network or its standard embedding into Euclidean space. Our main results pertain to networks with many conservation laws, so that all reactions are parallel to one other. Such "one-dimensional" networks include those networks having only one species. We also consider networks with only two reactions, and show that ACR is characterized by a well-known criterion of Shinar and Feinberg. Finally, up to some natural ACR-preserving operations -- relabeling species, lengthening a reaction, and so on -- only three families of networks with two reactions and two species have ACR. Our results are proven using algebraic and combinatorial techniques.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Nondegenerate Neural Codes and Obstructions to Closed-Convexity

Previous work on convexity of neural codes has produced codes that are open-convex but not closed-convex -- or vice-versa. However, why a code is one but not the other, and how to detect such discrepancies are open questions. We tackle these questions in two ways. First, we investigate the concept of degeneracy introduced by Cruz et al., and extend their results to show that nondegeneracy precisely captures the situation when taking closures or interiors of open or closed realizations, respectively, yields another realization of the code. Second, we give the first general criteria for precluding a code from being closed-convex (without ruling out open-convexity), unifying ad-hoc geometric arguments in prior works. One criterion is built on a phenomenon we call a rigid structure, while the other can be stated algebraically, in terms of the neural ideal of the code. These results complement existing criteria having the opposite purpose: precluding open-convexity but not closed-convexity. Finally, we show that a family of codes shown by Jeffs to be not open-convex is in fact closed-convex and realizable in dimension two.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Dynamics of ERK regulation in the processive limit

We consider a model of extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) regulation by dual-site phosphorylation and dephosphorylation, which exhibits bistability and oscillations, but loses these properties in the limit in which the mechanisms underlying phosphorylation and dephosphorylation become processive. Our results suggest that anywhere along the way to becoming processive, the model remains bistable and oscillatory. More precisely, in simplified versions of the model, precursors to bistability and oscillations (specifically, multistationarity and Hopf bifurcations, respectively) exist at all "processivity levels". Finally, we investigate whether bistability and oscillations can exist together.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Identifiability of Linear Compartmental Models: The Effect of Moving Inputs, Outputs, and Leaks

A mathematical model is identifiable if its parameters can be recovered from data. Here we investigate, for linear compartmental models, whether (local, generic) identifiability is preserved when parts of the model -- specifically, inputs, outputs, leaks, and edges -- are moved, added, or deleted. Our results are as follows. First, for certain catenary, cycle, and mammillary models, moving or deleting the leak preserves identifiability. Next, for cycle models with up to one leak, moving inputs or outputs preserves identifiability. Thus, every cycle model with up to one leak (and at least one input and at least one output) is identifiable. Next, we give conditions under which adding leaks renders a cycle model unidentifiable. Finally, for certain cycle models with no leaks, adding specific edges again preserves identifiability. Our proofs, which are algebraic and combinatorial in nature, rely on results on elementary symmetric polynomials and the theory of input-output equations for linear compartmental models.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Neural Codes With Three Maximal Codewords: Convexity and Minimal Embedding Dimension

Neural codes, represented as collections of binary strings called codewords, are used to encode neural activity. A code is called convex if its codewords are represented as an arrangement of convex open sets in Euclidean space. Previous work has focused on addressing the question: how can we tell when a neural code is convex? Giusti and Itskov identified a local obstruction and proved that convex neural codes have no local obstructions. The converse is true for codes on up to four neurons, but false in general. Nevertheless, we prove this converse holds for codes with up to three maximal codewords, and moreover the minimal embedding dimension of such codes is at most two.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access