Paper detail

When MAML Can Adapt Fast and How to Assist When It Cannot

Model-Agnostic Meta-Learning (MAML) and its variants have achieved success in meta-learning tasks on many datasets and settings. On the other hand, we have just started to understand and analyze how they are able to adapt fast to new tasks. For example, one popular hypothesis is that the algorithms learn good representations for transfer, as in multi-task learning. In this work, we contribute by providing a series of empirical and theoretical studies, and discover several interesting yet previously unknown properties of the algorithm. We find MAML adapts better with a deep architecture even if the tasks need only a shallow one (and thus, no representation learning is needed). While echoing previous findings by others that the bottom layers in deep architectures enable representation learning, we also find that upper layers enable fast adaptation by being meta-learned to perform adaptive gradient update when generalizing to new tasks. Motivated by these findings, we study several meta-optimization approaches and propose a new one for learning to optimize adaptively. Those approaches attain stronger performance in meta-learning both shallower and deeper architectures than MAML.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.