Paper detail

What is the minimal model of magnetic interactions in Fe-based superconductors?

Using noncollinear first-principles calculations we perform a systematic study of the magnetic order in several families of ferropnictides. We find a fairly universal energy dependence on the magnetization order in all cases. Our results confirm that a simple Heisenberg model fails to account for the energy dependence of the magnetization in couple of ways: first a biquadratic term is present in all cases and second the magnetic moment softens depending on the orientation. We also find that hole doping substantially reduces the biquadratic contribution, although the antiferromagnetic stripe state remains stable within the whole range of doping concentrations, and thus the reported lack of the orthorhombicity in Na-doped BaFe$_2$As$_2$ is probably due to factors other than a sign reversal of the biquadratic term. Finally, we discovered that even with the biquadratic term, there is a limit to the accuracy of mapping the density functional theory energetics onto Heisenberg-type models, independent of the range of the model.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.