Paper detail

What do the radiative decays of X(3872) tell us

Since the discovery of X(3872), its structure has been in ceaseless dispute. The data of $X(3872)\rightarrow π^+π^-π^0 J/ψ$ suggest that X(3872) may be a high-spin charmonium-like of $2^{-+}$. In terms of the light front quark model (LFQM) we calculate the rates of the radiative decays $X(3872)\rightarrow J/ψ(ψ')γ$ supposing X(3872) to be a $2^{-+}$ charmonium. Within this framework, our theoretical prediction on $\mathcal{BR}(X(3872)\rightarrowψ(1S)γ)$ is at order of $10^{-3}$ which is slightly lower than the Babar's data but close to the Belle's. Our prediction on $\mathcal{BR}(X(3872)\rightarrowψ'γ)$ is at order of $10^{-5}$ if $ψ'$ is a pure 2S state or $10^{-4}$ if $ψ'$ is a $2S-1D$ mixture, which does not conflict with the upper bound set by the Belle collaboration, but is much lower than the Babar's data. Thus if the future measurement decides the branching ratio of $\mathcal{BR}(X(3872)\rightarrowψ'γ)$ to be much larger than $10^{-4}$, the $2^{-+}$ assignment for X(3872) should be ruled out.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.