Paper detail

Weighting of topologically different interactions in a model of two-dimensional polymer collapse

We study by computer simulation a recently introduced generalised model of self-interacting self-avoiding trails on the square lattice that distinguishes two topologically different types of self-interaction: namely crossings where the trail passes across itself and collisions where the lattice path visits the same site without crossing. This model generalises the canonical interacting self-avoiding trail model of polymer collapse which has a strongly divergent specific heat at its transition point. We confirm the recent prediction that the asymmetry does not affect the universality class for a range of asymmetry. Certainly, where the weighting of collisions outweighs that of crossings this is well supported numerically. When crossings are weighted heavily relative to collisions the collapse transition reverts to the canonical theta-point-like behaviour found in interacting self-avoiding walks.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.