Paper detail

Weighted Shift Matrices: Unitary Equivalence, Reducibility and Numerical Ranges

An $n$-by-$n$ ($n\ge 3$) weighted shift matrix $A$ is one of the form $$[{array}{cccc}0 & a_1 & & & 0 & \ddots & & & \ddots & a_{n-1} a_n & & & 0{array}],$$ where the $a_j$'s, called the weights of $A$, are complex numbers. Assume that all $a_j$'s are nonzero and $B$ is an $n$-by-$n$ weighted shift matrix with weights $b_1,..., b_n$. We show that $B$ is unitarily equivalent to $A$ if and only if $b_1... b_n=a_1...a_n$ and, for some fixed $k$, $1\le k \le n$, $|b_j| = |a_{k+j}|$ ($a_{n+j}\equiv a_j$) for all $j$. Next, we show that $A$ is reducible if and only if $A$ has periodic weights, that is, for some fixed $k$, $1\le k \le \lfloor n/2\rfloor$, $n$ is divisible by $k$, and $|a_j|=|a_{k+j}|$ for all $1\le j\le n-k$. Finally, we prove that $A$ and $B$ have the same numerical range if and only if $a_1...a_n=b_1...b_n$ and $S_r(|a_1|^2,..., |a_n|^2)=S_r(|b_1|^2,..., |b_n|^2)$ for all $1\le r\le \lfloor n/2\rfloor$, where $S_r$'s are the circularly symmetric functions.

preprint2012arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.