Paper detail

Weak majorization inequalities for the cubic and quartic coefficients of $e^{(A+B)t}$ versus $e^{At}e^{Bt}$

Let $A,B\in\mathbb{H}_n$ and set $H=A+B$. For each integer $k\ge 1$ define $$ Q_k:=\sum_{p=0}^k \binom{k}{p} A^pB^{k-p}, R_k:=\Re\,Q_k=\frac{Q_k+Q_k^*}{2}. $$ Then $H^k=\left.\frac{d^k}{dt^k}e^{Ht}\right|_{t=0}$ and $Q_k=\left.\frac{d^k}{dt^k}(e^{At}e^{Bt})\right|_{t=0}$. We prove that, for $k=3,4,$ $$ λ(H^k)\prec_w σ(Q_k). $$ Equivalently, the eigenvalues of the cubic and quartic Taylor coefficients of $e^{(A+B)t}$ are weakly majorized by the singular values of the corresponding coefficients of the Golden--Thompson product $e^{At}e^{Bt}$. Our argument combines Ky Fan variational principles with explicit commutator identitiesfor $R_k-H^k$ at orders $k=3,4$, reducing the problem to the positivity of certain double-commutator trace forms tested against Ky Fan maximizing projections. We also record a general sufficient condition for higher orders based on commutator decompositions.

preprint2026arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.