Paper detail

Weak log majorization and determinantal inequalities

Denote by $¶_n$ the set of $n\times n$ positive definite matrices. Let $D = D_1\oplus \dots \oplus D_k$, where $D_1\in ¶_{n_1}, \dots, D_k \in ¶_{n_k}$ with $n_1+\cdots + n_k=n$. Partition $C\in ¶_n$ according to $(n_1, \dots, n_k)$ so that $\Diag C = C_1\oplus \dots \oplus C_k$. We prove the following weak log majorization result: \begin{equation*} λ(C^{-1}_1D_1\oplus \cdots \oplus C^{-1}_kD_k)\prec_{w \,\log} λ(C^{-1}D), \end{equation*} where $λ(A)$ denotes the vector of eigenvalues of $A\in \Cnn$. The inequality does not hold if one replaces the vectors of eigenvalues by the vectors of singular values, i.e., \begin{equation*} s(C^{-1}_1D_1\oplus \cdots \oplus C^{-1}_kD_k)\prec_{w \,\log} s(C^{-1}D) \end{equation*} is not true. As an application, we provide a generalization of a determinantal inequality of Matic \cite[Theorem 1.1]{M}. In addition, we obtain a weak majorization result which is complementary to a determinantal inequality of Choi \cite[Theorem 2]{C} and give a weak log majorization open question.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.